Active Users:1986 Time:25/10/2026 08:30:40 PM
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! Joel Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
Considering we named quarks for the noise ducks don't exactly make but maybe seagulls do and their binding particle for glue, then said they come in 'flavors' of 'Topness', Bottomness', etc and 'colors' I'm surprised we haven't just decided to start naming the damn things after breakfast cereals, now that we've exhausted just about every old alphabet, and still have J/? instead of picking one. It could be worse, geophysics has a term called 'giant radiating dyke swarms', all things considered it's probably better that editors, sci-fi writers, and mass media having been picking the names of a lot of this stuff.

So much of moondogs early collegiate career makes sense now.... :P
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 989 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 561 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 604 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 581 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 524 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 543 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 560 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 551 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 534 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 486 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 680 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 684 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 582 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 311 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 669 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 674 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 691 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 505 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 739 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 663 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 502 Views

Reply to Message