They say the data point to five Higgs bosons with similar masses but different electric charges.
Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.
Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.
I suppose this makes a certain amount of sense. I would imagine the two charged h would couple to the Weak and EM, while the remaining three would have colour charge and couple to the Strong.
IIRC, the Tevatron is just on the boundary of being able to detect some of the possible Higgs producing interactions, so I'd treat this with a pinch of salt until things become a bit clearer in the coming years as the LHC pushes further into its range. I also get the feeling that everyone at the Tevatron is very anxious to beat the LHC to discovering the Higgs!

Either way, my lecturer works at the Tevatron, so I'm sure he's very smug right now!
*MySmiley*_________jiggY,
~Life's a puzzle. Go figure.
_
nigelgoboom: "Whatever poopster..."
~Life's a puzzle. Go figure.
_
nigelgoboom: "Whatever poopster..."
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'
- 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM
913 Views
I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be.....
- 15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM
492 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists....
- 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM
528 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too.
- 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM
453 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him.
- 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
477 Views
- 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
477 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff
- 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
491 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!!
- 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
483 Views
- 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
483 Views
It's more than a few right answers.
- 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
615 Views
did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy
- 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
468 Views
- 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
468 Views
Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list!
- 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
506 Views
- 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
506 Views
right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning
- 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
605 Views
- 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
605 Views
It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets
- 15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM
517 Views
y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit!
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
204 Views
*NM*
- 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
204 Views
I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets.
- 16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM
503 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting.
- 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM
600 Views
Not quite.
- 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
596 Views
Re: Not quite.
- 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM
614 Views


Totally missed it *NM*