Active Users:187 Time:18/05/2024 05:47:26 PM
Not quite. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
They say the data point to five Higgs bosons with similar masses but different electric charges.

Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.

I suppose this makes a certain amount of sense. I would imagine the two charged h would couple to the Weak and EM, while the remaining three would have colour charge and couple to the Strong.

IIRC, the Tevatron is just on the boundary of being able to detect some of the possible Higgs producing interactions, so I'd treat this with a pinch of salt until things become a bit clearer in the coming years as the LHC pushes further into its range. I also get the feeling that everyone at the Tevatron is very anxious to beat the LHC to discovering the Higgs! :P

Either way, my lecturer works at the Tevatron, so I'm sure he's very smug right now! :|


The EM and strong forces have no Higgs couplings, as their carrier particles (photons and gluons) are massless. There's no proposal of any Higgs with a color charge as far as I'm aware, and definitely not in a SUSY model.

One Higgs doublet is actually four particles, three of which get "eaten" by the W+, W-, and Z bosons to generate their masses. (In technical terms, they're Goldstone bosons which provide the longitudinal polarization component; compare with the photon, which is massless and has no longitudinal polarization.) The fourth is what we generally think of as the actual "Higgs boson." If there were two doublets, that pattern would be repeated, so in addition to h, we'd have H+, H-, H, and A. (The A is a bit confusing given that A is usually used for photons in electroweak unification, but that's the convention.)

I'm at Fermilab this summer (working on CMS, though) and there is definitely a sense of rivalry. The Tevatron can no longer claim the highest energy, but this has just shifted everyone's bragging to focus on luminosity, where it still dominates.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 697 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 341 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 351 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 341 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 292 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 314 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 320 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 317 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 308 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 260 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 438 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 436 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 356 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 205 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 437 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 423 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 433 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 260 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 490 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 415 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 237 Views

Reply to Message