Active Users:983 Time:14/09/2025 04:16:03 AM
Not quite. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
They say the data point to five Higgs bosons with similar masses but different electric charges.

Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.

I suppose this makes a certain amount of sense. I would imagine the two charged h would couple to the Weak and EM, while the remaining three would have colour charge and couple to the Strong.

IIRC, the Tevatron is just on the boundary of being able to detect some of the possible Higgs producing interactions, so I'd treat this with a pinch of salt until things become a bit clearer in the coming years as the LHC pushes further into its range. I also get the feeling that everyone at the Tevatron is very anxious to beat the LHC to discovering the Higgs! :P

Either way, my lecturer works at the Tevatron, so I'm sure he's very smug right now! :|


The EM and strong forces have no Higgs couplings, as their carrier particles (photons and gluons) are massless. There's no proposal of any Higgs with a color charge as far as I'm aware, and definitely not in a SUSY model.

One Higgs doublet is actually four particles, three of which get "eaten" by the W+, W-, and Z bosons to generate their masses. (In technical terms, they're Goldstone bosons which provide the longitudinal polarization component; compare with the photon, which is massless and has no longitudinal polarization.) The fourth is what we generally think of as the actual "Higgs boson." If there were two doublets, that pattern would be repeated, so in addition to h, we'd have H+, H-, H, and A. (The A is a bit confusing given that A is usually used for photons in electroweak unification, but that's the convention.)

I'm at Fermilab this summer (working on CMS, though) and there is definitely a sense of rivalry. The Tevatron can no longer claim the highest energy, but this has just shifted everyone's bragging to focus on luminosity, where it still dominates.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 836 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 441 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 457 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 452 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 396 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 416 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 426 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 420 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 408 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 359 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 533 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 543 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 454 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 247 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 537 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 522 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 538 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 360 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 584 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 519 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 364 Views

Reply to Message