Active Users:1546 Time:25/08/2025 09:02:57 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
Really, the entire issue needs one big sit back to see what can and cannot be done to fix it. What really needs to be done is to find a way to make people not want to leave Mexico (but i don't mean "not move to the US";).

And yah, the stupid anchor baby law needs to be changed. It's totally ridiculous from both sides. My uncle was born off-shores during WWII and, according to my grandmother, it was way too much of a fight to get him naturalized (despite the fact both his parents were American and his father was stationed military).
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
At what point does it become ok to take over a country? Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM 1301 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM* random thoughts - 16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM 359 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM 333 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM 318 Views
Well, generally it's no longer seen as acceptable. Ghavrel - 16/08/2010 04:38:11 PM 938 Views
Revolución! *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:47:55 PM 335 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride. Legolas - 16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM 868 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride. snoopcester - 16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM 709 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM 334 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map... Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM 957 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself? Legolas - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM 661 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself? Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM 887 Views
Nah, they're willing to switch allegiances at the drop of a hat Brian - 16/08/2010 06:25:29 PM 750 Views
When it spills your pint and eyes up your woman? snoopcester - 16/08/2010 04:53:29 PM 812 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both Isaac - 16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM 831 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead random thoughts - 16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM 826 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM* Isaac - 16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM 340 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico. Tom - 16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 898 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM* Cannoli - 16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM 419 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem. Tom - 16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM 873 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM 326 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM* LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM 342 Views
Lol that rates right up there with the bridge to nowhere *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 06:49:19 PM 356 Views
Work Visas might help, but... Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM 1025 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM 763 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page Isaac - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM 678 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM 824 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM* Francie - 16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM 341 Views
west point? *NM* jh - 16/08/2010 08:56:58 PM 307 Views
Well take over and intervene are two totally different things Napoleon62 - 16/08/2010 09:00:50 PM 1035 Views
never *NM* Yunalesca - 16/08/2010 09:05:03 PM 340 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM 430 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM 334 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM 340 Views
Er, not enough Jews to be a problem, to put it crudely. Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:50:41 PM 913 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35 Isaac - 16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM 760 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM 801 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM 802 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". Camilla - 16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM 739 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to... Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM 911 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM 813 Views
Ah, snoopcester - 16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM 724 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM 353 Views
I second the motion to invoke Godwin's Law for closure... Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:11:22 PM 857 Views
Perhaps snoopcester - 16/08/2010 09:46:55 PM 716 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me. Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM 849 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM 800 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue. Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM 891 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue. Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM 771 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half? Bramhodoulos - 16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM 847 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM* Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM 348 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict" LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM 815 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase Isaac - 17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM 769 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware. Joel - 18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM 679 Views
It is fairly large, but yes Isaac - 18/08/2010 02:21:25 PM 757 Views
Well, yes, it WAS a purchase, but then, it would be. Joel - 18/08/2010 03:22:23 PM 1204 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM* random thoughts - 17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM 372 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it. LadyLorraine - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM 637 Views
At least we took the time to conquer it random thoughts - 18/08/2010 05:20:57 PM 982 Views
well they were not using it *NM* random thoughts - 17/08/2010 01:27:47 AM 320 Views
Once you solved all your own problems, I'm sure. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 16/08/2010 10:58:28 PM 336 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months Delireus - 16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM 816 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM* LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM 344 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. everynametaken - 17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM 658 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. Isaac - 17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM 730 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. everynametaken - 17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM 896 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM* damookster - 17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM 326 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes