As a Texan, I know full well why the US went to war with Mexico, and while Santa Anna is much to blame (had he upheld the 1824 Constitution as he was sworn to do TX might still be part of Mexico, and the terms of OUR treaty required him to forever renounce the Presidency. ) What's a lot more hazy is why that war, its casus belli or its outcome justify the Mexican Cession. What that boils down to is the US Army occupying all of Mexico, and allowing Mexico proper to regain its independence after extracting a hefty pound of flesh (probably more than anything because our territory was expanding TOO quickly at the time, forcing a showdown between "traditionalists" who wanted, on one hand, to restrict slavery to its historical limits and, on the other hand, to preserve the historic balance of power between agricultural slave and industrial free states. ) We screwed the natives more than adequately after we took control though; where's Geronimos skull? Don't tell the Comanche, Apache or Navajo that the US was blameless in the Mexican Cession (to be fair, troubles with the first two date back to the acquisition of TX, but most of TX is outside the easternmost range for the Comanches during their dominance. )
Not really saying we were good, though our conduct was like ten times better than the historical norms, but all redundant since I was correcting 'took' with 'bought' and even the gunpoint bit doesn't hold for all of it since we did buy the Gasdsen Purchase entirely peacefully. But yes, I am aware of the internal Whig-Dem conflict over the war and the checkered past with south western natives, those are all fair points but don't change the purchase aspect, you know I'm not an apologist for early american excesses.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
- 1187 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 308 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
- 281 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
- 269 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
- 725 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
- 585 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
- 280 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
- 788 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
- 547 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
- 767 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
- 711 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead
16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
- 704 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
- 290 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
- 784 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 362 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
- 751 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
- 273 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
- 287 Views
Work Visas might help, but...
16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
- 908 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
- 645 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page
16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
- 563 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans
16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
- 713 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
- 290 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 378 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
- 282 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
- 287 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
- 639 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking
16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
- 629 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
- 686 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
- 612 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
- 778 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 691 Views
Ah,
16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 589 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
- 303 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
- 719 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
- 677 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
- 728 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
- 650 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
- 724 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
- 286 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
- 688 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
- 639 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
- 557 Views
It is fairly large, but yes
18/08/2010 02:21:25 PM
- 633 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
- 320 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
- 507 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
- 693 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
- 294 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
- 532 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
- 604 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
- 762 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
- 271 Views