Roland00 is very intelligent. So is Maureen Dowd. I like to think that I am not totally dense. This, "Obama's problem is that he is the smartest man in the room" defense is getting more than tiresome. He's not Oppenheimer for god's sake. And if he's that damned smart then he knows enough not to shade his comments so they are subject to "misinterpretation" like Roland explained so eloquently above.
Mook
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
An amusing column on the NYC mosque by Maureen Dowd....
- 20/08/2010 12:33:27 AM
1624 Views
She has a point. Bush had the guts to weather the storm on DPW.
- 20/08/2010 12:42:21 AM
1028 Views
DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:50:14 AM
891 Views
Re: DPW? I keep sitting here trying to figure out what that means.
- 20/08/2010 12:56:44 AM
1155 Views
Once again, listen to the Economist and don't use abbreviations that aren't obvious.
- 20/08/2010 06:38:08 PM
910 Views
That abbreviation was obvious and all over the place at the time the incident happened.
- 20/08/2010 07:59:08 PM
944 Views
I certainly don't remember seeing it anywhere. The abbreviation was unnecessary in any event.
- 20/08/2010 10:43:05 PM
862 Views
Sure, I could've done that, if I had realized it would puzzle people. I did not. *NM*
- 20/08/2010 10:59:42 PM
546 Views
well since Christie is actually a republican he makes a better example than Bloomberg
- 20/08/2010 01:53:44 PM
979 Views
Gingrich thinks he is a deep thinker?
- 20/08/2010 09:42:15 AM
825 Views
He makes historical references as often as possible, or at least in pretty much everything I've seen
- 20/08/2010 12:37:02 PM
976 Views
As he was a history professor and writes histories and alternate histories, this is not surprising
- 20/08/2010 05:33:48 PM
1123 Views
I'm aware of that
- 20/08/2010 11:47:32 PM
847 Views
Re: I'm aware of that
- 21/08/2010 12:40:29 AM
1146 Views
Conservatives love Rome. I don't know why.
- 21/08/2010 01:20:27 AM
930 Views
Rome was more often than not governed by aristocrats and did, after all, invent the republic.
- 21/08/2010 04:50:53 PM
1269 Views
Except there doesn't seem to be any conflict between either position.
- 20/08/2010 10:06:20 AM
1087 Views
He has to learn he needs to be crystal clear on sensitive issues
- 20/08/2010 02:03:43 PM
1124 Views
In Washington, one must always present the APPEARANCE of integrity...
- 20/08/2010 02:40:24 PM
1031 Views
Clinton lied about the BJ but what is your airtight proof that Bush lied?
- 20/08/2010 07:44:53 PM
1105 Views
This is a bit along the lines of what I have been thinking.
- 20/08/2010 07:49:15 PM
1114 Views
I didn't see the problem either. He was simply stating the obvious.
- 21/08/2010 01:39:44 AM
854 Views
Then restating it for those who refused to hear it, so that someone else could refuse to hear it.
- 21/08/2010 04:22:30 PM
1123 Views
Yes, his backtracking was quite pussy-ish. *NM*
- 21/08/2010 04:00:31 AM
420 Views
How did he "backtrack" exactly?
- 21/08/2010 04:35:33 PM
1188 Views
c'mon Joel. are you being intentionally thick?
- 21/08/2010 05:02:27 PM
1183 Views
Having read those quotes I don't think he was backtracking on anything. (With link to speech)
- 22/08/2010 06:27:06 AM
1128 Views
did you take into your consideration
- 22/08/2010 03:50:59 PM
864 Views
I can't imagine why they would express concern over it. It wasn't controversial. That is on them
- 22/08/2010 03:58:32 PM
1057 Views
I agree he is not backtracking
- 22/08/2010 06:49:36 PM
984 Views
While we're picking sides, I'm with Mook and Roland.
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
892 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:20:11 PM
892 Views
I like how he's got rhetorical talents when it works
- 22/08/2010 08:32:15 PM
930 Views
nope just human
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
481 Views
*NM*
- 22/08/2010 08:37:17 PM
481 Views
that's not what Paul just said.
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
995 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:42:24 PM
995 Views
He couldn't stay out, no.
- 22/08/2010 08:56:47 PM
1048 Views
I don't want to argue with you on a Sunday, my religion says I have to relax.
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
1036 Views
- 22/08/2010 09:03:54 PM
1036 Views
key word: seem
- 22/08/2010 09:06:40 PM
968 Views
I was only using that term for you guys. I don't feel like beating you with a rolling pin until you
- 22/08/2010 09:14:39 PM
854 Views
Seems I interpret his speech on the iftar differently from you and Tash - see my reply to Tash. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:25:13 PM
578 Views
I'm not even taking the time to comment on something so obvious as what he did. *NM*
- 22/08/2010 02:53:10 AM
559 Views
Joel
- 22/08/2010 05:37:45 AM
1175 Views
His phrasing in the first speech implied that it was a bad idea. But legally they have the right.
- 22/08/2010 06:32:59 AM
1091 Views
nonsense
- 22/08/2010 03:39:30 PM
1031 Views
I still don't see how it can be misinterpreted except by intent by the listener.
- 22/08/2010 04:08:52 PM
1001 Views
so we have reached the point of no return...
- 22/08/2010 04:18:46 PM
1038 Views
In your case it would have to be number 2.
- 22/08/2010 07:38:20 PM
1000 Views
ah, but I have no agenda here...
- 22/08/2010 07:41:59 PM
847 Views
lol.<3
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
1000 Views
- 22/08/2010 08:49:35 PM
1000 Views
that it is...
- 22/08/2010 08:57:05 PM
1015 Views
hee. Well, I still don't agree with you, but at least you're snuggly.^_^ *NM*
- 22/08/2010 09:09:22 PM
724 Views
Tash you are very much a fair person in this world
- 22/08/2010 08:34:38 PM
1096 Views
Or there is another option: 3) He was using tact.
- 22/08/2010 09:01:49 PM
1018 Views
I really have to disagree with your interpretation of that first speech.
- 22/08/2010 09:22:32 PM
1288 Views
Lies, prevarication and deceit again, eh?
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1482 Views
- 22/08/2010 01:17:45 PM
1482 Views
that was a decent explanation....
- 22/08/2010 05:18:18 PM
932 Views
In the interests of fairness ( this does not support or detract from my position), here is the full
- 22/08/2010 09:22:50 PM
1248 Views
