Active Users:379 Time:02/05/2025 05:22:31 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM
I was just giving an example of when I wouldn't EXPECT to have visual privacy. I may be legally endowed it, but I wouldn't expect people to not be able/allowed to see me.

I'm pretty sure if he'd just seen them and complained, he wouldn't have been given peeping tom charges. Probably just told to shove off.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1486 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 886 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1042 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 913 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 871 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 911 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 889 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 969 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 849 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 990 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 428 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 914 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1058 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 946 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 849 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 945 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 957 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 421 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 412 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 897 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 946 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 822 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 957 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 811 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 933 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 951 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 862 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1108 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 402 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 438 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 957 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 843 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 794 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 774 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 859 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 996 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 412 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1004 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 944 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 859 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 934 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 954 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1013 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1058 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 917 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 807 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 843 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 410 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 895 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 352 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 832 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1118 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 408 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 933 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 894 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes