Active Users:1147 Time:16/09/2026 05:10:19 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM
I was just giving an example of when I wouldn't EXPECT to have visual privacy. I may be legally endowed it, but I wouldn't expect people to not be able/allowed to see me.

I'm pretty sure if he'd just seen them and complained, he wouldn't have been given peeping tom charges. Probably just told to shove off.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1821 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 1156 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1373 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 1180 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 1116 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 1199 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 1191 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 1209 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 1100 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 1243 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 566 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 1166 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1320 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 1203 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 1078 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 1201 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 1229 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 557 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 606 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 1170 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 1192 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 1070 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 1224 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 1086 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 1224 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 1201 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 1119 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1434 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 550 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 603 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1242 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 1120 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 1061 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 1064 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 1107 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 1338 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 561 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 1256 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 1218 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 1132 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 1231 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 1268 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1339 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1318 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 1192 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 1057 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 1110 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 568 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 1140 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 481 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 1080 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1379 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 552 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 1184 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 1166 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes