Active Users:2609 Time:19/06/2026 01:53:06 PM
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM
That's when problems started emerging. But I distinctly remember fantastic conversations in 2006.

You're conflating "desire" with "desperate fanaticism." Also, Chat died for the simple reason that a bunch of people ruined it for everyone. Interest died because it stopped being an interesting place.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 13/10/2010 at 04:27:03 AM
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1190 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 726 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 804 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 686 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 426 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 789 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 704 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 843 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 886 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 817 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 813 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 339 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 425 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 311 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 471 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 298 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 852 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 874 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 884 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 769 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 760 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 638 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 810 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 639 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 705 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 783 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 790 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 816 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 867 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 729 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 747 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 685 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 840 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 817 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 933 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 821 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 348 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 751 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 720 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 858 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 418 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 821 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 451 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 412 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 387 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 840 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 420 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 724 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 685 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 860 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 906 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 712 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 734 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 841 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 821 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 747 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 771 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 861 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 785 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 372 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 749 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 775 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 419 Views

Reply to Message