Active Users:2613 Time:14/09/2026 05:24:46 AM
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM
That's when problems started emerging. But I distinctly remember fantastic conversations in 2006.

You're conflating "desire" with "desperate fanaticism." Also, Chat died for the simple reason that a bunch of people ruined it for everyone. Interest died because it stopped being an interesting place.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 13/10/2010 at 04:27:03 AM
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1215 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 746 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 830 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 707 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 442 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 811 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 724 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 867 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 913 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 840 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 846 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 351 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 437 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 324 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 489 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 314 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 885 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 899 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 924 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 792 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 783 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 661 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 835 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 659 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 738 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 803 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 821 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 833 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 889 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 752 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 795 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 707 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 859 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 839 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 959 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 847 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 363 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 774 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 757 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 875 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 435 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 856 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 470 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 427 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 401 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 860 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 433 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 745 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 719 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 883 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 926 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 734 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 766 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 866 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 860 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 768 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 793 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 882 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 809 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 383 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 768 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 792 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 444 Views

Reply to Message