"Wanting" has nothing to do with it. There are few alternatives.
Tom Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 04:50:02 PM
The West has offered North Korea virtually everything it can think of - recognition, food, fuel, economic investment and development, security guarantees - but North Korea's regime is propped up so poorly, and so dependent on the perpetuation of a military standoff, that it is afraid to even engage on China-style reforms that might stabilize the country. As we know, it made some half-hearted efforts to create special economic zones, which it then closed quickly.
"Wanting" or "not wanting" war is irrelevant. We need to accept that North Korea is an unstable and dangerous regime that will only become more dangerous if allowed to remain. If China is unwilling to control its puppet state, the West should be ready to remove that state. China would not directly participate in a war that would destroy its economic growth and precipitate a potential revolution at home, and if for some crazy reason it did, then the same logic that says now is the time to fight rather than 50 years from now is doubly true with respect to China as it is with respect to North Korea.
"Wanting" or "not wanting" war is irrelevant. We need to accept that North Korea is an unstable and dangerous regime that will only become more dangerous if allowed to remain. If China is unwilling to control its puppet state, the West should be ready to remove that state. China would not directly participate in a war that would destroy its economic growth and precipitate a potential revolution at home, and if for some crazy reason it did, then the same logic that says now is the time to fight rather than 50 years from now is doubly true with respect to China as it is with respect to North Korea.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
North Korea attacks South Korea and no one mentions it?
- 23/11/2010 10:56:03 AM
1563 Views
"Oh God, Oh God, we are all going to die?"
- 23/11/2010 11:09:30 AM
1314 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:09:30 AM
1314 Views
Yup, but the day Beijing decides they're better off not intervening the Appeasers look very dumb.
- 23/11/2010 11:23:35 AM
1166 Views
The appeasers look very dumb at this point regardless.
- 23/11/2010 04:11:41 PM
1071 Views
yes, because we want to fight *ANOTHER* proxy war with china
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 04:29:18 PM
584 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 04:29:18 PM
584 Views
"Wanting" has nothing to do with it. There are few alternatives.
- 23/11/2010 04:50:02 PM
1222 Views
Honestly, it COULD go either way.
- 23/11/2010 05:14:18 PM
1360 Views
The fact that it could go either way is a testimony to the longevity of Chinese leaders.
- 23/11/2010 07:04:14 PM
1181 Views
I don't believe in striking first but, frankly, it's long been a moot point.
- 23/11/2010 05:09:49 PM
1208 Views
You know I like to sleep in, remember?
- 23/11/2010 11:20:33 AM
1159 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:20:33 AM
1159 Views
Agreed
- 23/11/2010 02:07:30 PM
1267 Views
I worry North Korea long ago decided to solve domestic problems with international aggression.
- 23/11/2010 02:26:36 PM
1191 Views
That is 'cause everyone else is hiding out in their nuclear bunkers
- 23/11/2010 11:40:33 AM
1147 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:40:33 AM
1147 Views
Re: That is 'cause everyone else is hiding out in their nuclear bunkers
- 23/11/2010 11:46:03 AM
1190 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:03 AM
1190 Views
Re: That is 'cause everyone else is hiding out in their nuclear bunkers
- 23/11/2010 11:57:51 AM
1066 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:57:51 AM
1066 Views
The really sad part is, that along with everything else worthwhile in the British Empire...
- 25/11/2010 09:49:00 AM
1316 Views
I actually had no clue.
- 23/11/2010 01:14:20 PM
1163 Views
Re: I actually had no clue.
- 23/11/2010 01:15:10 PM
1037 Views
Re: I actually had no clue.
- 23/11/2010 04:32:17 PM
1142 Views
Re: I actually had no clue.
- 23/11/2010 04:36:59 PM
1105 Views
Careful; qualify all your generalizations and people (especially him) will think you're me.
- 25/11/2010 02:03:42 PM
1256 Views
- 25/11/2010 02:03:42 PM
1256 Views
Nuke the fuckers and be done with it. And let China know it's their fault. *NM*
- 23/11/2010 02:58:56 PM
562 Views
you know the world doesn't exist until america wakes up in the morning, right? *NM*
- 23/11/2010 04:27:27 PM
569 Views
OK, have had time to read it, and someone needs to fact check a very important part of that article.
- 23/11/2010 04:52:02 PM
1212 Views
Fact checking:
- 23/11/2010 08:38:57 PM
1181 Views
The term "truce" used in a different Guardian article seems better.
- 23/11/2010 09:20:19 PM
1093 Views
Well
- 23/11/2010 05:24:02 PM
1184 Views
Same reason we don't give all our allies (especially neighbors) our best hardware.
- 23/11/2010 07:43:54 PM
1169 Views
Actually, no, it looks like The Guardian is just schizoid on this subject.
- 23/11/2010 08:16:45 PM
1405 Views
This has been coming for a while but I hoped the West would step up and help out. *NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:31:40 PM
623 Views
There's not going to be any all-out conflict
- 24/11/2010 12:56:44 AM
1378 Views
They're getting aid from South Korea now, and killing them anyway.
- 24/11/2010 01:20:33 AM
1278 Views
No kidding, that's been going on for quite some time.
- 24/11/2010 02:49:50 AM
1138 Views
That is the crux of it, I suppose.
- 24/11/2010 03:02:40 PM
1233 Views
~shrugs~ SK has lived with this a long time, and will continue to do so.
- 24/11/2010 10:26:44 PM
1207 Views
Parts of it have; some South Koreans stopped living with it a few days ago.
- 25/11/2010 01:48:02 PM
1816 Views
