I just want a scanner that works, and is safe. If the backscatter machines qualify, then I wish people would shut up and use them. If they don't, I wish we'd develop something else, because pat-downs seem inherently error prone. With that said, I totally agree with the new more "invasive" pat-down measures. If you have to do a pat-down, (this is the part I don't agree with, but assuming that it's true) it makes no sense to avoid certain areas. If you don't pat the chest or genital areas, that's exactly where weapons will start to be hidden. I don't like pat-downs in general, but what good they're able to accomplish is completely negated by allowing people their modesty.
So. Yes, I support the new pat-down measures until we can confirm the safety of the backscatter machines, or develop a better technology.
So. Yes, I support the new pat-down measures until we can confirm the safety of the backscatter machines, or develop a better technology.
So, people travelling in the US tomorrow: are you opting out?
23/11/2010 10:45:03 PM
- 897 Views

Meh.
23/11/2010 11:23:17 PM
- 858 Views
How did the NYTimes phrase this again... oh yes.
23/11/2010 11:42:29 PM
- 874 Views
This article about "Isrealification" is interesting
24/11/2010 12:54:59 AM
- 913 Views
We have that saying here, too.
24/11/2010 01:50:03 AM
- 836 Views
Re: We have that saying here, too.
24/11/2010 02:05:09 AM
- 769 Views
a loaded gun clip was found left on a plane by an off-duty cop just today in fact....
24/11/2010 05:06:15 AM
- 666 Views
You're missing the point
24/11/2010 09:48:42 AM
- 748 Views
The thing about the gun just proves how good the behavioural profiling is.
25/11/2010 09:49:55 AM
- 561 Views
If all goes as they say it does, it sounds like a very good system *NM*
24/11/2010 04:23:42 AM
- 287 Views
No, US air traffic controllers don't go on strike.
24/11/2010 01:37:30 AM
- 786 Views
I've got no problem with the scanners, but people are welcome to object
24/11/2010 02:20:25 AM
- 988 Views
I see some sheep have replied to your post. *NM*
24/11/2010 03:17:00 AM
- 256 Views
I assume you are less than fond of the situation, then? *NM*
24/11/2010 03:25:45 AM
- 384 Views
You assume correctly.
24/11/2010 03:44:23 AM
- 907 Views
If grandmas aren't getting groped at the airport...
24/11/2010 04:38:50 AM
- 751 Views
just out of curiousity, do either you or litdog have any solutions?
24/11/2010 04:59:07 AM
- 650 Views
Stop adding useless and invasive procedures. *NM*
24/11/2010 05:19:23 AM
- 285 Views
yes that's all well and good.
24/11/2010 05:37:01 AM
- 572 Views
It would be the same as it was before this nonsense. EDITED
24/11/2010 06:18:57 AM
- 811 Views
if that's what your comfortable with, then. Fair enough *NM*
24/11/2010 06:22:46 AM
- 262 Views
Read my edit for what I think is a bit more balanced.
*NM*
24/11/2010 06:29:11 AM
- 254 Views

Become the enemy and they win, but is this is really a Civil Rights issue?
24/11/2010 02:16:43 PM
- 844 Views
At least have the decency to refer to us as 'sheeple' *NM*
24/11/2010 03:39:47 AM
- 256 Views
You didn't seem to be among the sheep.
*NM*
24/11/2010 03:45:06 AM
- 263 Views

i will make sure to pat my girlfriend down before we get in the car and start driving
*NM*
24/11/2010 05:16:43 AM
- 254 Views

Only morons fly in the U.S. on Thanksgiving day. *NM*
24/11/2010 05:42:04 PM
- 346 Views
Here's a report on the scanners, that you might just want to get felt up.
24/11/2010 08:56:09 PM
- 782 Views
I'm half-tempted to engage in some frottage with the girlfriend while waiting in the pat-down line.
25/11/2010 03:43:47 AM
- 620 Views