Active Users:660 Time:14/06/2026 12:48:00 AM
crap! I will be watching this! dacole Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM
Crap my science class my just watch this rather than have class...

NASA Sets News Conference on Astrobiology Discovery; Science Journal Has Embargoed Details Until 2 p.m. EST On Dec. 2


WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

The news conference will be held at the NASA Headquarters auditorium at 300 E St. SW, in Washington. It will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website at http://www.nasa.gov.

Participants are:
- Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington
- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
- Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
- Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.
- James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

Media representatives may attend the conference or ask questions by phone or from participating NASA locations. To obtain dial-in information, journalists must send their name, affiliation and telephone number to Steve Cole at stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov or call 202-358-0918 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              202-358-0918      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              202-358-0918      end_of_the_skype_highlighting by noon Dec. 2.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1246 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 687 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 837 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 342 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 331 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 729 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 866 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 782 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 770 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 681 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 812 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 346 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 284 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 683 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 728 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 663 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 858 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 798 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 754 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 880 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 326 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 292 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 728 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 828 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 742 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 935 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 727 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1035 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 711 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 950 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 658 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 847 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 735 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 703 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 655 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 700 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 813 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 751 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 299 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 734 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 683 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 303 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 694 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 676 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 693 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 270 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 280 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 276 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 657 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 760 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 282 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 295 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 808 Views

Reply to Message