Active Users:1705 Time:29/07/2026 02:58:45 PM
crap! I will be watching this! dacole Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM
Crap my science class my just watch this rather than have class...

NASA Sets News Conference on Astrobiology Discovery; Science Journal Has Embargoed Details Until 2 p.m. EST On Dec. 2


WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

The news conference will be held at the NASA Headquarters auditorium at 300 E St. SW, in Washington. It will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website at http://www.nasa.gov.

Participants are:
- Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington
- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
- Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
- Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.
- James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

Media representatives may attend the conference or ask questions by phone or from participating NASA locations. To obtain dial-in information, journalists must send their name, affiliation and telephone number to Steve Cole at stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov or call 202-358-0918 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              202-358-0918      end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              202-358-0918      end_of_the_skype_highlighting by noon Dec. 2.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1273 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 708 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 859 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 356 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 342 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 745 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 907 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 800 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 790 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 697 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 834 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 355 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 295 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 705 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 745 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 688 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 877 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 820 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 774 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 897 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 337 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 300 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 746 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 849 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 758 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 955 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 746 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1051 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 728 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 965 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 675 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 863 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 753 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 719 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 673 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 716 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 864 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 776 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 310 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 752 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 701 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 320 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 710 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 695 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 712 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 285 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 292 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 290 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 673 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 778 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 293 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 308 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 829 Views

Reply to Message