- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
Standing joke, her website is ironlisa.com, "Fe=Iron" and all, Iron Lisa. Oceanographer IIRC.
Should be interesting but 'interesting' probably in the 'recent models predict abnormal amino acids content of high-water celestial bodies may be detectable in atmospheric traces which may be observable via telescope' sort of way, I'd be disinclined to think any solid evidence of ET, even little bacteria, will actually show up and that it will be very important new info but to the lay public about as important as the wonderful new development on spin ice or such, I'd love to be wrong but I'd advise everyone to keep their hopes (or fears) down.
I amuse myself.
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system?
- 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM
1176 Views
photsynthesis using arsnic hmm I am going to have to check this out
- 30/11/2010 05:07:22 AM
767 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
- 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM
666 Views
Re: If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
- 30/11/2010 05:18:05 AM
833 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there.
- 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM
792 Views
Bwa?
- 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM
723 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely.
- 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
757 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM
324 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM
260 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias.
- 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM
624 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework.
- 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM
667 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit?
- 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM
606 Views
I think he is saying
- 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM
803 Views
In short, demanding that everyone use your particular worldview is unfair.
- 01/12/2010 02:21:26 AM
717 Views
- 01/12/2010 02:21:26 AM
717 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence.
- 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM
798 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM*
- 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM
269 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard.
- 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM
672 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality.
- 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM
760 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe?
- 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM
686 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago.
- 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM
751 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
- 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM
1022 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
- 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
1061 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa"
- 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM
743 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
- 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM
700 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM
272 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"!
- 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM
681 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet!
- 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM
622 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM
275 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged?
- 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM
633 Views
It's this kind of blind adherence to political correctness that is tearing us apart!
- 01/12/2010 01:28:39 AM
612 Views
They had better have a green man *NM*
- 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM
240 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM
244 Views
Oh no you didn't
*NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM
248 Views
*NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM
248 Views
