Active Users:1651 Time:29/07/2026 03:51:44 PM
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. Tom Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
No life other than us makes it easier to say that the emergence of life in the universe was an accident, a one-off sort of thing that happened for no reason despite our best efforts to impute a reason.

Life everywhere makes life seem like a natural progression of the growth of the universe. If sentient life exists elsewhere, then sentience is a natural goal of the universe, which may support the idea that conscious existence is something the universe is striving for.

Combine that with the cyclical reality that is presupposed by the "echoes of pre-Big Bang events" that removes the linear isolation of the universe and you have a much richer reality being hinted at.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1273 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 708 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 860 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 356 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 343 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 746 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 908 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 801 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 791 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 697 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 836 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 355 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 296 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 705 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 745 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 690 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 879 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 822 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 776 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 899 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 337 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 300 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 748 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 851 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 759 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 957 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 746 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1053 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 730 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 967 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 677 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 865 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 754 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 720 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 674 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 716 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 866 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 777 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 310 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 754 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 701 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 320 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 712 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 697 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 714 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 285 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 292 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 290 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 675 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 780 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 293 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 308 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 831 Views

Reply to Message