It's pretty messed up when one of the resident physicists can't follow the conversation when the matter at hand appears to be cosmic principles 

That anthropomorphizing the universe does not represent an irrational cognitive error if you are assuming from the start that there is a Creator of some sort that is relatable on human terms, as you might assume from a religious viewpoint. So you're not misattributing human characteristics because they really do exist - given the assumptions of a particular metaphysical framework (i.e. religious beliefs).
Is that right? I think that's right.
Insert theme music here.
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system?
- 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM
1273 Views
photsynthesis using arsnic hmm I am going to have to check this out
- 30/11/2010 05:07:22 AM
857 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
- 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM
746 Views
Re: If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
- 30/11/2010 05:18:05 AM
916 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there.
- 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM
907 Views
Bwa?
- 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM
801 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely.
- 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
835 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM
355 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM
296 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias.
- 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM
705 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework.
- 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM
745 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit?
- 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM
690 Views
I think he is saying
- 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM
879 Views
In short, demanding that everyone use your particular worldview is unfair.
- 01/12/2010 02:21:26 AM
801 Views
- 01/12/2010 02:21:26 AM
801 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence.
- 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM
899 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM*
- 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM
300 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard.
- 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM
748 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality.
- 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM
851 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe?
- 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM
759 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago.
- 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM
825 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
- 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM
1108 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
- 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
1134 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa"
- 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM
865 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
- 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM
777 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM*
- 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM
310 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"!
- 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM
753 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet!
- 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM
701 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM
320 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged?
- 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM
712 Views
It's this kind of blind adherence to political correctness that is tearing us apart!
- 01/12/2010 01:28:39 AM
689 Views
They had better have a green man *NM*
- 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM
285 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM
292 Views
Oh no you didn't
*NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM
290 Views
*NM*
- 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM
290 Views
