Active Users:955 Time:12/09/2026 11:41:53 PM
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM
Empirical evidence must be augmented by logical analysis to provide a full explanation of reality, of course, but that's not the issue here. Without evidence as an objective standard, there is no way to distinguish the relative accuracies of any worldviews. I could say "evidence of extraterrestrial life shows that the universe is a giant house cat, and it creates life so that it will have mice to chase," and without some standard for comparison, that would be just as legitimate a statement.


Logic, empirical evidence, and the scientific method are undoubtedly useful, and they can explain our immediate surroundings quite well, but they are inadequate when taken to the extremes.

For instance, you can follow a trail of evidence back through time to the Big Bang, and then it breaks down. What caused that explosion? Where did it come from? The cyclical universe theory can push back further, but there must at some point have been a beginning.

If there was a beginning, what caused it? If not, what was there before? There are really only three possibilities. The first is that the universe came into being out of nothing, in violation of the laws of physics. The second is that the universe itself is eternal and has always existed in one form or another. The third is that it was created by a higher power.

There is not, and I suspect that there never can be, any empirical evidence to prove or disprove any of those possibilities. No matter what sort of reality you choose to believe in, you believe in it by faith.

Since you're free to place your faith in anything you wish, you could of course choose to believe in the eternal house cat that is the universe, and that would indeed be just as valid a conception of true reality as any that you can reach through evidence alone.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1295 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 724 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 880 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 368 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 354 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 763 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 929 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 815 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 805 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 715 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 849 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 363 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 305 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 719 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 763 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 716 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 891 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 838 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 791 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 918 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 346 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 309 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 764 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 870 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 775 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 970 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 766 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1066 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 747 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 984 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 692 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 883 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 771 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 738 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 688 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 736 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 896 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 797 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 318 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 771 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 717 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 329 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 725 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 713 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 728 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 297 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 301 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 297 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 689 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 798 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 304 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 316 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 846 Views

Reply to Message