Active Users:687 Time:18/12/2025 07:02:12 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes to both Maria Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM
Tim was going to ask this the other day (he's just had an exam for criminal law) but forgot so I have decided to do it for him.

1) Do you think (consensual) incest should be illegal? Please give your reason.

Yes. Children are too young to understand the consequences. I've seen what incest might to to people after having worked at a psychiatry ward - those people were completely ruined.

2) What about necrophilia?

Should be illegal. The dead should be treated with honour.



Hope your exam went well Tim
Maria





Little?
Me?
Far from it.
I am just large enough.
Fill myself completely
lengthwise and across
from top to bottom.
Are you larger than yourself maybe?

-Ingrid Hagerup-
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 700 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 459 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 445 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 418 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 398 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 411 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 446 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 398 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 401 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 399 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 362 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 383 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 170 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 406 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 408 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 377 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 413 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 358 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 445 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 431 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 388 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 410 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 478 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 342 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 400 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 373 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 401 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 398 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 387 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 404 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 175 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 390 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 155 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 403 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 407 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 377 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes