Active Users:349 Time:05/07/2025 03:02:34 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Who brought children into it? Tim Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM
Child abuse is a crime regardless of any genetic relation. If you legalised incest it wouldn't make any difference whatsoever to the legality of child abuse.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 657 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 413 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 387 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 378 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 358 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 360 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 405 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 360 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 362 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 358 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 317 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 346 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 151 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 367 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 366 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 329 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 372 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 314 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 401 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 389 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 348 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 369 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 422 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 293 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 360 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 334 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 359 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 354 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 345 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 365 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 159 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 354 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 139 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 358 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 366 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 339 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes