Active Users:604 Time:17/06/2026 04:27:36 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Who brought children into it? Tim Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM
Child abuse is a crime regardless of any genetic relation. If you legalised incest it wouldn't make any difference whatsoever to the legality of child abuse.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 751 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 512 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 499 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 470 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 453 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 467 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 501 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 451 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 458 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 452 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 420 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 432 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 190 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 455 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 463 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 429 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 465 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 413 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 502 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 489 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 437 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 465 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 536 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 401 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 460 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 423 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 454 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 447 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 446 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 448 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 194 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 436 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 177 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 449 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 462 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 429 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes