Active Users:493 Time:14/12/2025 10:49:54 PM
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
Not because I'm a liberal, though I am, and not because Loughner's a conservative (his own friends say he was neither right nor left, and Ayn Rand and Mein Kampf are strange favorites for liberals). It's because of one of the best examples of what Ms. Palin and others call "blood libel":
We're in Sarah Palin's 'targeted' list, but the thing is that the way she has it depicted, we're in the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize that there are consequences to that action.

Care to take a wild "shot" at the speaker?

US Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) ten months before Jared Loughner shot her in the head.

Why, if I were Sarah Palin I'd fly to that hospital and tell her to watch her mouth! Though she's still unable to speak; maybe the "blood libel" has solved itself: YOU'RE safe now, Sarah! :rolleyes: How tragic that nearly being murdered has blinded Rep. Giffords to the REAL victim: Sarah Palin. :vomits:

It was logical for the media to connect Palins imagery with the attack, since Rep. Gifford did, too,a year before it happened. If someone had been running all over Britain yelling, "Blast Parliament!" in the summer of 1605, most people would probably have thought Guy Fawkes had them in mind that November. It was irresponsible not to wait for all the facts before publicizing those suspicions, true; on the other hand, Ms. Palin is in no position to lecture anyone on careless language. I don't believe for a moment she intended or expected this to happen, but she SHOULD'VE expected that in a nation of 300 million there was a good chance some nut would take her literally, and if she didn't I don't want her running the local quickie mart. Yeah, a lot of liberals were too quick to shout, "J'ACCUSE!" but Palin in particular was far too eager to wash her hands of it, and the only reason she didn't do it quicker is probably because she spent the first couple days making calls to see if she'd gotten six people killed and injured thirteen more. She knows it, I know it and the American people ought to know it.

Sorry, I REALLY didn't want to examine the potential political relevance to this horrible tragedy, and I really don't think the connection with Palin is more than eerie coincidence. We don't know; Loughner's saying nothing. However, it very easily COULD'VE been connected, so easily that the first victim EXPECTED something like this based solely on Palins comments and imagery, and calling that "blood libel" is quite literally blaming the victim. Whatever happened to "personal accountability"? Were those just more words we shouldn't take seriously...? :[
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2151 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1013 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1178 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1228 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1190 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1547 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1088 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1115 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1102 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1006 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 952 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1142 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1022 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1069 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1110 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1092 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1128 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1183 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1275 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 950 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1097 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1070 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1153 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1195 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1343 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1043 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1285 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 893 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1102 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 927 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1309 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1177 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1125 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1175 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1311 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1044 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1067 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1129 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 936 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1138 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1239 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1072 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1127 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1207 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1187 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1015 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1031 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1048 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1084 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1337 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1352 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1098 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1017 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1038 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1028 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1110 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1218 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1107 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1111 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1051 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1333 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1160 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 977 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1056 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1116 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 512 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 483 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1009 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 524 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1199 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 946 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 978 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 935 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1096 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 967 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 953 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1106 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 992 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1161 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 990 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1036 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 969 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1077 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 874 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 972 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1012 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1090 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1218 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 964 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1011 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1307 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1137 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1145 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 564 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 885 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 995 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1072 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 914 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 544 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1151 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1178 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1220 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1164 Views

Reply to Message