Active Users:423 Time:18/09/2025 02:04:28 AM
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
However, what makes it so egregious in this case is that the Loughners principal target had ten months earlier implied Palins crosshair imagery put her life at risk. Consequently, anyone calling that "blood libel" is quite literally blaming the victim, and Palin doing it is literally adding insult to injury.

I honestly think Palin was as shocked and horrified by this as anyone, if perhaps for very different reasons, but that simply means she lacks the judgement to lead. Giffords saw what Palins language might do to her ten months before Loughner tried to kill her, but Sarah Palin STILL can't see a problem.

EDIT: Never mind my redacted paragraph; it's irrelevant to this issue.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 16/01/2011 at 10:28:29 PM
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2121 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 978 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1151 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1194 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1140 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1510 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1053 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1081 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1068 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 973 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 922 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1109 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 991 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1037 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1078 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1058 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1096 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1150 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1241 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 918 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1065 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1037 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1126 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1159 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1307 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1010 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1254 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 858 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1066 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 893 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1276 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1147 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1092 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1140 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1278 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1015 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1031 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1091 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 904 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1107 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1184 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1040 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1074 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1173 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1154 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 999 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1017 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1052 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1302 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1321 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1059 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 986 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1006 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 996 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1079 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1186 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1075 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1078 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1017 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1292 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1126 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 936 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1022 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1084 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 495 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 465 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 971 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 508 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1163 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 915 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 946 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 903 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1059 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 933 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 919 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1074 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 958 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1126 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 948 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1003 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 936 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1047 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 841 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 937 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 980 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1057 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1188 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 932 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 973 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1265 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1101 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1112 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 550 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 852 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 958 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1038 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 882 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 531 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1117 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1145 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1186 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1130 Views

Reply to Message