Active Users:617 Time:07/11/2025 04:56:05 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so. Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
Sorry you argument has no weight for multiple reasons.

First your entire "blaming the victim" argument is complete BS. Blaming the victim is when you blame someone for being a victim and imply they brought it on themselves. Look at Tom's reply and you will get a better understanding of what blaming the victim looks like.

Of course, if words mean what you choose them to mean it makes sense to see it that way, but given what Loughners reported to have said, it's ironic.
Second, Gifford claiming that there would be consequences does not some how magically become valid because of an unrelated incident. You little leap in logic that because she said makes any attacks on the lefties trying use this to attack the right is an attack Gifford really fails. Sorry.

You should be; since I can only guess at that last sentences meaning I won't try to respond.
Third, the left needs to either shut the fuck up with all the bullshit whining about hate filled rhetoric or stop all of their own hate filled rhetoric because crying like a bunch of scared little girls while they attack none stop is both tiring and pathetic. They are either to stupid to see what they are doing are they are stupid enough to think the rest of us won’t notice either way it is loser strategy and pafrt of the reason why they accomplish so little beyond leading a few sheep around by the nose. One little taste of liberals in power and the conservatives have their best election ever.

How I wish the Dems were liberal, but that's beside the point (tangents are MY bailiwick, but I'm trying to stay on topic, really). Strong rhetoric is one thing, but incindiary dehumanizing rhetoric filled with violent imagery is dangerous, and I sincerely hope you're not so naïve you think Loughner was oblivious or unsympathetic to the literal interpretations of that. Yes, it's just as bad from the left and I do condemn it just as strongly; you used to make jabs about me visiting Kos and I'd retort that I do no such thing: This is one reason why. Loughner is an antigovernment nut, and while only one side of the political spectrum has "antigovernment" as a PLATFORM PLANK (but he's CLEARLY a liberal ) if McCain had won the election Loughners twisted mind could easily have taken Kos' rhetoric as a call to murder. Ultimately, this isn't about left vs. right, it's about demagoguery vs. sanity, because the former is manifestly dangerous to all political persuasions. I'm truly sorry if being "right" (in every sense) is more important to you than that.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 20/01/2011 at 01:53:06 AM
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. Joel - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2138 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? Camilla - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 995 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. Joel - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1165 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... Legolas - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1213 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". Joel - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1170 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already Isaac - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1534 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. Legolas - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1070 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either Isaac - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1100 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. Legolas - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1091 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. Isaac - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 994 Views
Oh please don't you start to random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 937 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. Legolas - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1127 Views
it was used here and nobody commented random thoughts - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1009 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here Isaac - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1050 Views
It's funny you should say that... Legolas - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1094 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin). Joel - 19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM 1238 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim random thoughts - 19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM 1174 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died. Joel - 19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM 903 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... Isaac - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1076 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. Joel - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1112 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal Isaac - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1168 Views
I never said it was. Joel - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1260 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. Legolas - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 934 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means? random thoughts - 19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM 978 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely. Legolas - 19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM 1095 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? random thoughts - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1082 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. Legolas - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1057 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM 959 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. Joel - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1142 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. Isaac - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1180 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. Joel - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1325 Views
That means precisely nothing Isaac - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1025 Views
It means everything. Joel - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1272 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic Chas - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 875 Views
There are two points: Joel - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1084 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM* Chas - 19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM 515 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable. Joel - 19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM 1061 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it. Joel - 20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM 1094 Views
Re: It means everything. Isaac - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 909 Views
That's simply illogical. Joel - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1294 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument random thoughts - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1162 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing. Joel - 20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM 1025 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM* random thoughts - 20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM 505 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way. Joel - 20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM 1058 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1112 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel. Joel - 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM 1002 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin random thoughts - 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM 1079 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so. Joel - 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM 1390 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing random thoughts - 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM 1036 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM 1083 Views
so in other words you again missed the point random thoughts - 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM 1015 Views
Well, one of us did. Joel - 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM 1150 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"? random thoughts - 20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM 771 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin? Joel - 20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM 1218 Views
So I am a little confused on something... MightyYT - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1159 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this Joel - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1299 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... MightyYT - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1032 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. Joel - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1048 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. Isaac - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1109 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. Joel - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 921 Views
No, they don't Isaac - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1123 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. Joel - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1220 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said Isaac - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1055 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) Joel - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1110 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity Isaac - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1194 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? Joel - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1173 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens random thoughts - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 998 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM 935 Views
way to dodge the point again random thoughts - 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM 973 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one? Joel - 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM 1038 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* Isaac - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1017 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. Joel - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1032 Views
There is no point Isaac - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1070 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. Joel - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1319 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. Dragonsoul - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1340 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? Dannymac - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1078 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1003 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. Joel - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1024 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1012 Views
That first line is says it all. Joel - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1095 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist random thoughts - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1202 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". Joel - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1092 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? random thoughts - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1097 Views
YOU are cherry picking. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1035 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... Shannow - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1314 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. Dannymac - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1143 Views
Yeah, your first was better Isaac - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 955 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result. Joel - 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM 1108 Views
And I call bullshit Cannoli - 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM 1238 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face. Joel - 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM 1201 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin? Shannow - 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM 1091 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM* random thoughts - 19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM 507 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do. Joel - 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM 1178 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM* Elaine - 18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM 593 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. Tom - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1040 Views
Pretty much. Joel - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1100 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* Tashmere - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 505 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know). Joel - 17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM 1047 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 475 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. Joel - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 993 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* random thoughts - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 516 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". Joel - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1183 Views
Took you this long, huh? Macharius - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 933 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick. Joel - 18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM 1270 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy random thoughts - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 964 Views
I'm just curious. callandor1000 - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 921 Views
Re: I'm just curious. Camilla - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1077 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. Joel - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 955 Views
like I said a matter of faith random thoughts - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 937 Views
I find it interesting... Jeordam - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1089 Views
I mention her looks solely because... callandor1000 - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 979 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party. Joel - 18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM 1227 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). Joel - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1145 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity random thoughts - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 967 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? Joel - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1022 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you random thoughts - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 953 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. Joel - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1062 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't random thoughts - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 859 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. Joel - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 955 Views
only in your does the connection exisit random thoughts - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 998 Views
No. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1077 Views
dude wake up random thoughts - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1206 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations. Joel - 20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM 1208 Views
So in your opinion... Jeordam - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 949 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? Joel - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 993 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? Cannoli - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1284 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. Joel - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1121 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner random thoughts - 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM 1067 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues. Joel - 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM 1153 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right random thoughts - 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM 938 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit Joel - 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM 985 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics' Isaac - 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM 931 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I? Joel - 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM 1261 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state random thoughts - 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM 1005 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM 966 Views
it was the national democrats random thoughts - 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM 1071 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC. Joel - 20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM 1334 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue random thoughts - 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM 976 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense. Joel - 20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM 951 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. Jacob - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1129 Views
Exactly. *NM* Avendesora - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 557 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox Isaac - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 869 Views
You missed the point, obviously. Jacob - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 975 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO random thoughts - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1055 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated Isaac - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 899 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* Jacob - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 538 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. Joel - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1139 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. Camilla - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1161 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. Joel - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1202 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. dart_board - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1147 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact Joel - 22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM 1123 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes