I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
Sorry you argument has no weight for multiple reasons.
First your entire "blaming the victim" argument is complete BS. Blaming the victim is when you blame someone for being a victim and imply they brought it on themselves. Look at Tom's reply and you will get a better understanding of what blaming the victim looks like.
First your entire "blaming the victim" argument is complete BS. Blaming the victim is when you blame someone for being a victim and imply they brought it on themselves. Look at Tom's reply and you will get a better understanding of what blaming the victim looks like.
Of course, if words mean what you choose them to mean it makes sense to see it that way, but given what Loughners reported to have said, it's ironic.
Second, Gifford claiming that there would be consequences does not some how magically become valid because of an unrelated incident. You little leap in logic that because she said makes any attacks on the lefties trying use this to attack the right is an attack Gifford really fails. Sorry.
You should be; since I can only guess at that last sentences meaning I won't try to respond.
Third, the left needs to either shut the fuck up with all the bullshit whining about hate filled rhetoric or stop all of their own hate filled rhetoric because crying like a bunch of scared little girls while they attack none stop is both tiring and pathetic. They are either to stupid to see what they are doing are they are stupid enough to think the rest of us won’t notice either way it is loser strategy and pafrt of the reason why they accomplish so little beyond leading a few sheep around by the nose. One little taste of liberals in power and the conservatives have their best election ever.
How I wish the Dems were liberal, but that's beside the point (tangents are MY bailiwick, but I'm trying to stay on topic, really). Strong rhetoric is one thing, but incindiary dehumanizing rhetoric filled with violent imagery is dangerous, and I sincerely hope you're not so naïve you think Loughner was oblivious or unsympathetic to the literal interpretations of that. Yes, it's just as bad from the left and I do condemn it just as strongly; you used to make jabs about me visiting Kos and I'd retort that I do no such thing: This is one reason why. Loughner is an antigovernment nut, and while only one side of the political spectrum has "antigovernment" as a PLATFORM PLANK (but he's CLEARLY a liberal
) if McCain had won the election Loughners twisted mind could easily have taken Kos' rhetoric as a call to murder. Ultimately, this isn't about left vs. right, it's about demagoguery vs. sanity, because the former is manifestly dangerous to all political persuasions. I'm truly sorry if being "right" (in every sense) is more important to you than that.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 20/01/2011 at 01:53:06 AM
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
2230 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"?
- 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM
1111 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable.
- 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM
1271 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but...
- 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM
1309 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already
- 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM
1666 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread.
- 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM
1188 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either
- 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM
1208 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it.
- 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM
1195 Views
Oh please don't you start to
- 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM
1032 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before.
- 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM
1230 Views
it was used here and nobody commented
- 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM
1125 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here
- 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM
1156 Views
It's funny you should say that...
- 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM
1198 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin).
- 19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM
1340 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim
- 19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM
1295 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died.
- 19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM
1017 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that...
- 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM
1180 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry.
- 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM
1211 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright.
- 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM
1038 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means?
- 19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM
1083 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely.
- 19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM
1198 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either
- 17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM
1067 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
1246 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM
1303 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her.
- 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM
1433 Views
That means precisely nothing
- 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM
1131 Views
It means everything.
- 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM
1372 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic
- 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM
976 Views
There are two points:
- 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM
1196 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM*
- 19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM
558 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable.
- 19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM
1179 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it.
- 20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM
1200 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument
- 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM
1268 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing.
- 20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM
1135 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM*
- 20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM
552 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way.
- 20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM
1154 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic
- 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM
1216 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel.
- 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM
1095 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin
- 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM
1200 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
- 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
1514 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing
- 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
1149 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin.
- 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
1195 Views
so in other words you again missed the point
- 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM
1132 Views
Well, one of us did.
- 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM
1256 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"?
- 20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM
888 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin?
- 20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM
1325 Views
So I am a little confused on something...
- 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM
1261 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this
- 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM
1400 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly...
- 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM
1126 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
1158 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM
1227 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically.
- 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM
1028 Views
No, they don't
- 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM
1225 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one.
- 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM
1330 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said
- 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM
1161 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice)
- 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM
1226 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity
- 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM
1302 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice?
- 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM
1280 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens
- 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM
1106 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing.
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
1033 Views
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
1033 Views
way to dodge the point again
- 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM
1091 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one?
- 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
1148 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again*
- 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM
1126 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it.
- 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM
1143 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book.
- 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM
1454 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither.
- 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM
1127 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto
- 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM
1113 Views
That first line is says it all.
- 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
1221 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist
- 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM
1308 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power".
- 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM
1211 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
- 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
1426 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result.
- 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM
1211 Views
And I call bullshit
- 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM
1344 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face.
- 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM
1301 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin?
- 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM
1187 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM*
- 19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM
575 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do.
- 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
1282 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM*
- 18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM
646 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed.
- 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM
1144 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM*
- 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM
554 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know).
- 17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM
1157 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM*
- 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM
522 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah.
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
1097 Views
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
1097 Views
Took you this long, huh?
- 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM
1029 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick.
- 18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM
1377 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy
- 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM
1069 Views
I'm just curious.
- 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM
1025 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party.
- 18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM
1330 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ).
- 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM
1261 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity
- 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM
1107 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs?
- 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM
1120 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you
- 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM
1067 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM
1170 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't
- 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM
962 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that.
- 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM
1062 Views
only in your does the connection exisit
- 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM
1096 Views
No.
- 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM
1212 Views
dude wake up
- 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
1302 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations.
- 20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM
1319 Views
Why not just blame Giffords?
- 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM
1410 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does.
- 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM
1224 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner
- 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM
1184 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues.
- 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM
1250 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right
- 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM
1047 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
1085 Views
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
1085 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics'
- 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM
1033 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I?
- 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
1370 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state
- 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM
1106 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric.
- 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM
1067 Views
it was the national democrats
- 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM
1202 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC.
- 20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM
1442 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue
- 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM
1087 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM
1058 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me.
- 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM
1232 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox
- 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM
980 Views
You missed the point, obviously.
- 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM
1086 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long.
- 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM
1242 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM
1263 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact
- 22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM
1247 Views

Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM*