Active Users:616 Time:03/08/2025 03:55:52 PM
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing random thoughts Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
He blamed Palin for the slander attacks launched against her. Said she had basically brought on herself because she is so polarizing. That is blaming the victim. You are trying to claim Palin is blaming the victim when Palin in no way implied the victim’s actions were responsible for the intact on them.

You can't just change what a phrase means. Sorry.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2109 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 960 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1137 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1182 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1130 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1497 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1038 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1064 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1056 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 963 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 912 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1096 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 975 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1022 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1062 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1044 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1085 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1129 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1225 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 904 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1047 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1023 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1108 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1147 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1291 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 992 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1236 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 844 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1051 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 877 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1261 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1136 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1083 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel. - 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM 974 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin - 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM 1048 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so. - 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM 1355 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing - 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM 1006 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin. - 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM 1051 Views
so in other words you again missed the point - 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM 986 Views
Well, one of us did. - 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM 1117 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1125 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1264 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1001 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1018 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1080 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 893 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1093 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1170 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1027 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1060 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1128 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1142 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 988 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1007 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1037 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1288 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1306 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1044 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 972 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 993 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 985 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1070 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1177 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1061 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1063 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1001 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1282 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1112 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 926 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1009 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1067 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 490 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 459 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 957 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 500 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1148 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 903 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 933 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 893 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1046 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 918 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 910 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1063 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 946 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1117 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 934 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 986 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 921 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1036 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 829 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 920 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 969 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1040 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1174 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 916 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 959 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1254 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1088 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1099 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 543 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 838 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 949 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1022 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 866 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 524 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1103 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1132 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1176 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1117 Views

Reply to Message