Active Users:481 Time:03/03/2026 04:29:21 PM
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin. Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
He blamed Palin for the slander attacks launched against her. Said she had basically brought on herself because she is so polarizing. That is blaming the victim. You are trying to claim Palin is blaming the victim when Palin in no way implied the victim’s actions were responsible for the intact on them.

You can't just change what a phrase means. Sorry.

I believe he simly said he saw why the connection was made; be careful, if you post that that makes him a liberal he may accuse YOU of libel. Since he's a lawyer his opinion of whether the libel charge carries more weight with me than the "Christian values" former PTA president whose daughter dropped out of HS to have a baby out of wedlock (and, yes, when she campaigns on family values and came up from the PTA both of those facts are relevant to her leadership competence).
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2169 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1032 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1201 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1247 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1214 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1587 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1111 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1141 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1133 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1026 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 976 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1164 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1048 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1087 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1133 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1116 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1153 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1204 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1302 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 972 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1120 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1093 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1180 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1223 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1367 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1068 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1312 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 911 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1128 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 949 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1336 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1200 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1156 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel. - 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM 1040 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin - 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM 1120 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so. - 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM 1432 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing - 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM 1080 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin. - 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM 1119 Views
so in other words you again missed the point - 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM 1056 Views
Well, one of us did. - 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM 1187 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1199 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1336 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1064 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1090 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1153 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 962 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1161 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1263 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1093 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1155 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1235 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1212 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1036 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1056 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1076 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1112 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1359 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1373 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1122 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1042 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1058 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1049 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1141 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1239 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1128 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1135 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1075 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1359 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1177 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 1001 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1075 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1139 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 525 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 492 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1033 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 534 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1224 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 966 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 1005 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 970 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1118 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 991 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 979 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1131 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 1012 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1188 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 1021 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1060 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 990 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1103 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 895 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 998 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1036 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1116 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1243 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 983 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1040 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1343 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1162 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1163 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 575 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 907 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 1020 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1095 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 935 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 559 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1178 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1204 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1248 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1197 Views

Reply to Message