Active Users:441 Time:18/09/2025 04:07:26 AM
dude wake up random thoughts Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
In paragraph without referring to the 60'a can you show any single connection between him and Palin?

Giffords 2010 statement about Palins imagery and Loughners 2011 shooting are a BIT more recent, yes, so consider it done. Just because it started then doesn't change the fact it hasn't stopped.


connect the dots. Show how those to events are in anyway connected.

Can you in anyway show that he followed the politics beyond his own little conspiracy rants?

Can I show he followed it WITHOUT referencing him following it? That's literally impossible. Can you show Obama follows Dems beyond leading them?


No can you show anywhere he was following Palin? Can you show anything beyond you just knowing that would make someoen believe that anything Palin said had an impact on him or that he was even aware of what Palin said about her? His friends say he didn't follow politics so good luck.

If you insist that despite any actual evidence to support you that the political atmosphere played a role in this can you provide any factual evidence that would suggest it was right wing rhetoric and not left wing rhetoric that drove him to this? Because despite all the left wing rhetoric to the contrary the left has zero high ground when it comes to rhetoric.


I see you skipped this one.

If someone kills Palin tomorrow do you think having some many liberals accuse her of inspiring murder will be to blame? Do you think that all of the unfounded attacks on her increase the likelihood that some nut job will try and kill her? If so please go chastise yourself for being a hate monger and inspiring violence.

I've been very careful to avoid violent imagery; I usually am, and for good reason, so, no, if someone commits an act of violence for which I've never even implied support I won't feel responsible. You're reaching, and it smells, rightly or not, of desperation. The connection with Palin herself was made in 2010, but you want evidence more recent than the '60s. I have to show Loughners political actions and interests without referencing any of them. And, to top it all off, the now classic "how dare you call him a conservative when he's obviously a liberal" as if there are so few conservative pols in AZ that liberal nuts there have to gun down fellow liberals.


Sorry but have in way made a connection between what Palin said in his actions. That really is the long and short of this debate. You have nothing to connect these to except your desire for them to be connected.

If that's the best way you can defend the far rights inflammatory violent rhetoric you should CONSIDER the possibility it's indefensible.


I think the whole far right inflammatroy rhetoric argument is a stinky pile of crap that can't be defended and is only believed by the far left. SHow me something to make me believe the right is doing this even a tiny bit more then the left. Please don't come back with the worthless reply that you condem both sides unless you are willing stop calling it right wing rhetoric.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2123 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 979 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1151 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1196 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1142 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1511 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1054 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1082 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1069 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 975 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 923 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1110 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 992 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1038 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1079 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1059 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1098 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1151 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1242 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 920 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1066 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1038 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1127 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1160 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1308 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1011 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1255 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 859 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1067 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 894 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1277 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1147 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1094 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1142 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1279 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1015 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1032 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1092 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 906 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1110 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1184 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1040 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1075 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1174 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1155 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 999 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1018 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1053 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1303 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1324 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1061 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 987 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1007 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 997 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1080 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1187 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1076 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1079 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1019 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1293 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1127 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 937 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1023 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1085 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 496 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 465 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 973 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 508 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1164 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 917 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 947 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 904 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1061 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 933 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 920 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1076 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 959 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1128 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 949 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1005 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 937 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1047 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 842 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 938 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 981 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1058 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1190 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 932 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 974 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1266 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1102 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1112 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 551 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 853 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 959 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1040 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 883 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 532 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1118 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1146 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1187 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1131 Views

Reply to Message