Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
Personally I'd rather states put it to a direct vote on the ballot, keeps it clean from any legislative antics and makes it harder for the legislature to repeal it or pass it themselves if it fails since the electorate makes their will known, but so long as it's not the courts doing it and so long as it left churches and such the freedom not perform the ceremonies I've got no issue with it.
And if you're not convinced by the philosophical aspects, you should be by the successful fear- and misinformation-based campaigns run against gay marriage nationwide wherever it's been up for popular vote.
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
- 25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM
1377 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this.
- 25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM
678 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection.
- 25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM
673 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married?
- 26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM
682 Views
Church Doctrine.
- 26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM
807 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church.
- 26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM
698 Views
Yeah okay...
- 26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM
736 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes.
- 27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM
706 Views
Seems fine to me
- 25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM
674 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
802 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM
747 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right.
- 26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM
663 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM*
- 26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM
291 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage
- 26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM
641 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example
- 26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM
674 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law
- 28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM
654 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious
- 28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM
713 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly
- 29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM
668 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought
- 29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM
712 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational.
- 30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM
787 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational
- 30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM
861 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM
1255 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM
860 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM
1126 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational.
- 30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM
702 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM
848 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect
- 27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM
645 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history.
- 28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM
760 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience
- 28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM
785 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common.
- 30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM
692 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
- 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
310 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone...
- 26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM
567 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause.
- 26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM
677 Views
