Active Users:406 Time:13/05/2025 03:52:35 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Meh, you never know. Dragonsoul Send a noteboard - 26/06/2011 12:58:37 AM
Considering they protected the Church from being forced to perform gay marriages against it's will, and I don't recognize any marriage performed outside the Catholic Church anyway, this really doesn't change anything for me.

As far as I'm aware, attempts to force the Catholic Church or any other Church to perform marriages against its will - of divorced people, for instance - have never been successful before, so why would they be successful now?


Nothing is ever successful until it is. I like having the extra protection.
Reply to message
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage Dominic - 25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM 1234 Views
Good. *NM* Camilla - 25/06/2011 07:40:52 AM 408 Views
Re: Federalism is so fucking slow. *NM* Gaps - 25/06/2011 02:47:11 PM 246 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this. Dragonsoul - 25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM 596 Views
Makes sense to me. Joel - 25/06/2011 04:00:07 PM 785 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection. Legolas - 25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM 589 Views
There are two reasons, depending on ones position on the issue. Joel - 25/06/2011 06:04:27 PM 640 Views
Meh, you never know. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 12:58:37 AM 735 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married? random thoughts - 26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM 595 Views
Church Doctrine. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM 716 Views
That is simply not true Roland00 - 26/06/2011 08:20:59 AM 654 Views
Yes it is. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 05:14:29 PM 669 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church. Tom - 26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM 612 Views
Yeah okay... Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM 653 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes. Dannymac - 27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM 626 Views
Are you sure about this? Camilla - 30/06/2011 04:47:57 PM 513 Views
Dragonsoul is wrong Roland00 - 01/07/2011 09:21:43 AM 665 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* Legolas - 25/06/2011 04:05:15 PM 230 Views
Seems fine to me Isaac - 25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM 585 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Dreaded Anomaly - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM 720 Views
Direct democracy is the only true democracy. *NM* Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 01:01:26 AM 250 Views
Sometimes it is grand not being a True Scottsman *NM* Roland00 - 26/06/2011 08:21:49 AM 240 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Isaac - 26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM 665 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right. Great Lord of Chaos - 26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM 581 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM* Isaac - 26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM 251 Views
Then you're a rare person. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 26/06/2011 03:36:11 AM 252 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage Helene - 26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM 564 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example Isaac - 26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM 586 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law Helene - 28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM 579 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious Isaac - 28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM 623 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly Helene - 29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM 581 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought Isaac - 29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM 625 Views
I'll address the bulk of this later Helene - 29/06/2011 07:58:48 PM 505 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM 684 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational Isaac - 30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM 750 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM 1149 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Isaac - 30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM 762 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM 1030 Views
We're gonna have to pick this up another time Isaac - 01/07/2011 04:37:25 AM 600 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational. Helene - 30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM 612 Views
Fair Enough Isaac - 01/07/2011 04:32:44 AM 656 Views
Btw, in case you were wondering, I do like you Helene - 01/07/2011 02:17:42 PM 664 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Dreaded Anomaly - 26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM 761 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect Isaac - 27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM 557 Views
I'm all for occasionally forcing stuff down people's throats... LadyLorraine - 28/06/2011 11:44:12 AM 551 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history. Dreaded Anomaly - 28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM 664 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience Isaac - 28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM 694 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM 603 Views
Perhaps, you seem to be claiming not do that yourself though Isaac - 30/06/2011 01:40:57 PM 704 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM* beetnemesis - 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM 259 Views
Good. *NM* ironclad - 25/06/2011 11:41:30 PM 236 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone... TaskmasterJack - 26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM 486 Views
So, fifth time is a charm? everynametaken - 26/06/2011 06:38:26 AM 700 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause. Tom - 26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM 593 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes