As long as account holders indefinitely surrender enough of their money for the bank to invest?
Joel Send a noteboard - 01/10/2011 02:35:49 AM
That is what that amounts to, right? I agree with Tim: As long as account holders are in the black, the bank owes them, not the reverse.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 01/10/2011 at 02:36:17 AM
Bank of America faces outrage over debit card charge
30/09/2011 06:27:03 PM
- 944 Views
I'm so glad I don't bank with them.
30/09/2011 07:01:32 PM
- 544 Views
I just went to TD for my personal acount today...we are still looking for our joint account... *NM*
30/09/2011 08:15:57 PM
- 196 Views
screw all the big banks
30/09/2011 07:19:36 PM
- 492 Views
I love my credit union, so drama free. I would never switch to a bank. *NM*
01/10/2011 03:04:39 AM
- 237 Views
Yeah, do more of what made folks mad enough to pass a federal law and kill your stock price.
30/09/2011 08:35:19 PM
- 476 Views

Hopefully this means no-one will dare do that here, having seen the reaction.
30/09/2011 11:11:29 PM
- 490 Views
Can't believe they're still in business. They are a shame to the human race. *NM*
30/09/2011 11:26:32 PM
- 212 Views
You mean BoA, not banks in general, right?
01/10/2011 02:41:36 AM
- 605 Views

Maintaining a modest sum of money in checking/savings/CDs obviates this charge and most others
01/10/2011 02:02:51 AM
- 539 Views
Hm?
01/10/2011 02:12:41 AM
- 482 Views
Right. It's not an issue if the combined total meets BoAs requirement.
01/10/2011 02:33:15 AM
- 646 Views
The bank may have the right to protect itself from losing money
01/10/2011 03:15:52 AM
- 559 Views
Yes, but griping about pains arising from symptoms does nothing to cure the disease.
01/10/2011 03:25:29 AM
- 546 Views
I'm still right.
*NM*
01/10/2011 04:23:06 AM
- 202 Views

As long as account holders indefinitely surrender enough of their money for the bank to invest?
01/10/2011 02:35:49 AM
- 470 Views
No. I mean BoA doesn't want to have clients who cost money rather than make money for the bank.
01/10/2011 02:57:20 AM
- 540 Views
Well, charging people $5/month to use their own money will not accomplish that goal.
01/10/2011 03:24:07 AM
- 491 Views
Sure it will. They'll pay the fees or they'll leave. Either way BoA wins on that front.
01/10/2011 03:31:23 AM
- 597 Views
I suppose, if turning the departure of account holders into a stampede counts as "winning."
01/10/2011 04:18:11 AM
- 566 Views
If it's limited to the targeted account holders, the unprofitable ones, then it is winning.
01/10/2011 04:53:20 AM
- 553 Views
But the targeting is determined by how much money account holders semi-permanently loan banks.
01/10/2011 05:49:57 AM
- 615 Views
Love my credit union, I would never use a bank if I absolutely didn't have too. Go CUs!
*NM*
01/10/2011 03:06:21 AM
- 206 Views
