It really went off the rails around the lesbian covens and survivalists. You have a gift of incomprehensibility.
It is called, "hyerbole." It is a form of something called, "rhetoric." The point was that, once again, Romneys stated positions run the full range of the political spectrum (sorry, I really cannot think of a simpler clearer way to say that.) Therefore, whatever ones stance on any issue, Romney has taken a directly opposing stance at one time or another. Furthermore, because his positions on virtually every issue, even the federal healthcare law he practically created, have so frequently and completely altered in such short time periods, there is real question whether he is COMMITTED to anything except the presidency itself. With Obama we had no idea what to expect because he had not been in government long; Romney has been in government nearly a decade and we STILL do not know what to expect.
In any case, Massachusetts did decently under Romney, and while I'd rather not have four years of him, I'd much prefer him than anyone else the GOP has put forth so far. Illuminati Mormon heirarch conspiracy theories aside.
I did not mention them, nor his Wall Street hierarchy connections, though both are relevant, IMHO. There are plenty of other reasons to be frightened of Romney, however. Massachusetts did great under Romney because he was building his resume to follow in his fathers footsteps with a presidential run, and made sure to keep people happy by whatever policy necessary. Of course, Governor Romneys legacy is the state health insurance law that mandated participation without ensuring affordability, the law he said in his book last year he wanted to take national; Obama did just that and Candidate Romney has vowed to repeal it his first day as president. In other words, as a presidential candidate, Mitt Romney has repudiated his single most significant accomplishment as governor of MA; do you REALLY think that makes his record as governor a good predictor of his record as president?
Yes, he reassured you and much of the far left with far left policy as governor of MA; now he is reassuring the far right with far right policies as a presidential candidate. There is no reason to expect he would implement their policy goals or yours as president: He will promise anyone anything to get elected, even if it means flip flopping on a major issue in the course of a single day, then do as he pleases, and we cannot know what that is until he is inaugurated.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
So I am curious. What do our site conservatives think of Cain?
- 18/10/2011 09:35:47 AM
1081 Views
I have trouble taking him seriously
- 18/10/2011 01:59:23 PM
770 Views
That is the problem with all Romneys opponents.
- 18/10/2011 03:32:50 PM
778 Views
what positions of Perry's do you consider radical?
- 18/10/2011 03:56:30 PM
668 Views
Well, abolishing Social Security is pretty far out there, and publicly threatening the Fed Chairman.
- 18/10/2011 04:50:03 PM
877 Views
yes but I was talkin about his actuall posistions not the made up stuff *NM*
- 18/10/2011 05:10:47 PM
362 Views
When the candidate "makes them up" they are positions.
- 18/10/2011 05:26:18 PM
684 Views
all you need to do is provide a link supporting your claim that Perry said he wants to abolish SS
- 18/10/2011 05:56:23 PM
625 Views
Really? Do you not watch the news? That's common knowledge *NM*
- 18/10/2011 06:04:06 PM
278 Views
I believe what RT means ...
- 18/10/2011 06:22:42 PM
653 Views
No it isn't a fine point
- 18/10/2011 06:48:00 PM
811 Views
He said he wants private retirement accounts instead, which is abolishing Social Security.
- 18/10/2011 10:44:33 PM
803 Views
Privatizing isn't the same as abolishing
- 18/10/2011 10:53:04 PM
732 Views
It is unless the governments role is more than "you MUST do this; figure out how on your own."
- 19/10/2011 12:10:25 AM
800 Views
Are you correcting yourself or qualifying your statement?
- 19/10/2011 06:30:34 AM
785 Views
Neither; laws requiring everyone do something do NOTHING themselves.
- 20/10/2011 10:10:31 AM
768 Views
The ALL CAPS stuff isn't helping to convince me that this isn't all kool-aid drenched hyperbole
- 20/10/2011 01:15:19 PM
737 Views
Some things are better off in private hands, but "natural dependcies" are not among those things.
- 20/10/2011 03:42:15 PM
895 Views
It is ridiculously simple; here ya go:
- 18/10/2011 08:15:24 PM
730 Views
OK he doesn't like it now give me the link where he wants to abolish it
- 18/10/2011 09:29:38 PM
663 Views
You see no conflict between this post and your next one?
- 18/10/2011 10:16:21 PM
820 Views
- 18/10/2011 10:16:21 PM
820 Views
no I don't
- 18/10/2011 11:36:38 PM
765 Views
By his own statements he either wants to end it or violate the Constitution.
- 19/10/2011 12:13:33 AM
733 Views
you really excell at misunderstanding *NM*
- 19/10/2011 12:30:32 AM
312 Views
I understand you but disagree, because I also understand plain English.
- 19/10/2011 02:06:23 AM
825 Views
More qualified to be President than Obama was at this stage.
- 18/10/2011 07:40:33 PM
691 Views
I assume you're refering to his implemented policies of corporate welfare? *NM*
- 18/10/2011 07:46:07 PM
296 Views
He did say, "at this stage;" Obama has been a quick study at corporate welfare.
- 19/10/2011 01:19:39 AM
693 Views
So this is an "Anybody but Obama" election for you, then? *NM*
- 19/10/2011 12:16:46 AM
271 Views
I thought that was a given, the reason Republicans will swallow their bile/tongues and vote Romney.
- 19/10/2011 01:17:46 AM
728 Views
Not just anyone. That way lies more idiocy than ignoring lies and pandering.
- 19/10/2011 07:23:18 AM
840 Views
His speeches do have a clear socialist agenda; too bad none of his policies have a hint of one.
- 20/10/2011 10:25:01 AM
864 Views
Post-debate, my opinion is fairly unchanged
- 19/10/2011 06:35:32 AM
870 Views
Romney slapped Perry down so hard tonight. It was wonderful.
- 19/10/2011 06:53:52 AM
751 Views
- 19/10/2011 06:53:52 AM
751 Views
It was that, I rather enjoyed it
- 19/10/2011 07:10:49 AM
705 Views
I promise
- 19/10/2011 10:33:49 AM
813 Views
I can see the buttons now: "Vote for... something... maybe...!"
- 20/10/2011 10:46:44 AM
1140 Views
...the words made sense by themselves, but when I put them together, meaning vanished.
- 20/10/2011 11:33:46 AM
670 Views
Try sounding out each word.
- 20/10/2011 11:59:25 AM
747 Views
let me ask you this about Cain
- 19/10/2011 01:47:36 PM
796 Views
Why is that, would you think?
- 19/10/2011 06:29:53 PM
728 Views
There just seems to be strong lack of good choices
- 19/10/2011 06:50:25 PM
777 Views
I'm getting the same impression... not necessarily worse candidates, just more criticism.
- 19/10/2011 08:37:21 PM
914 Views
I blame the press
- 19/10/2011 09:05:36 PM
877 Views
It's rare that I agree with you so fully. Politics is the demesne of soundbites. *NM*
- 20/10/2011 12:38:48 AM
258 Views
I blame the public, and, to a lesser degree, Nielsen and Armitron.
- 20/10/2011 11:39:43 AM
795 Views

