Active Users:550 Time:07/01/2026 09:58:54 PM
Not entirely. Tom Send a noteboard - 23/02/2012 06:30:18 PM
Aeryn is forgetting that the NY State and City taxes allow for a high standard deduction that would offset the tax rates such that the effective rate for someone making only $15,000 would be at or near 0%. In fact, someone making only $15,000 would probably be getting an EITC to supplement that income, rather than paying tax at any level.

However, in New York state, sales tax is on EVERYTHING - clothes, food, you name it. This is why cost-conscious people often go to New Jersey, where clothes are not subject to sales tax. And it is high, so there is a tax on consumption that they have to pay.

Of course, that doesn't help the Federal government at all, it just helps the state pay for the overpaid transit workers and teachers in rubber rooms that they can't fire due to union contracts.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Why Joel is CRAZY - Nearly Half of All Americans Don't Pay Federal Income Taxes - 23/02/2012 04:43:15 AM 1800 Views
A not so hypothetical situation... - 23/02/2012 05:46:44 AM 1200 Views
Your paying more money now than then. Lower rate but more money *NM* - 23/02/2012 07:52:51 AM 715 Views
Accurate statement, but not a justification *NM* - 23/02/2012 03:44:55 PM 592 Views
Re: A not so hypothetical situation... - 23/02/2012 02:39:43 PM 1302 Views
I don't know much about that. - 23/02/2012 03:53:27 PM 1112 Views
Why the heck do you think the current tax system is skewed to the rich? - 23/02/2012 03:18:43 PM 1325 Views
That's a fair question - 23/02/2012 03:52:08 PM 1210 Views
Once again, poor people have no money with which to pay taxes. - 23/02/2012 06:23:07 AM 1350 Views
You're operating under the same fallacy he does - that people should pay income taxes. - 23/02/2012 12:05:52 PM 1414 Views
In much the same way - 23/02/2012 01:40:58 PM 1359 Views
Same argument re: fallacies - 24/02/2012 02:52:17 PM 1210 Views
Was meant as a joke reply - 02/03/2012 06:30:15 PM 1514 Views
Joel is crazy, but I highly doubt that this is "why" - 23/02/2012 01:36:37 PM 1388 Views
HA! HA! Very well played! *NM* - 23/02/2012 03:49:35 PM 537 Views
I see your point, but not how it changes much in the conversation where we discussed that - 25/02/2012 01:49:29 AM 1196 Views
Joel, get your head out of your ass, if that is possible - 25/02/2012 07:02:34 PM 1238 Views
You kiss your momma with that ad hominem? - 27/02/2012 09:11:33 AM 1403 Views
You mention this statistic all the time. - 23/02/2012 02:16:47 PM 1084 Views
Obviously, we are talking about the bottom 50%..... - 23/02/2012 03:22:43 PM 1079 Views
How do you account for retired folks? - 23/02/2012 04:18:59 PM 1309 Views
social security isn't taxable either *NM* - 24/02/2012 04:21:21 AM 621 Views
Easy... he doesn't. - 25/02/2012 02:56:05 AM 1046 Views
I wonder how much of that statistic is students - 23/02/2012 02:22:58 PM 1331 Views
Federal taxes - 23/02/2012 04:18:22 PM 1219 Views
Your figures are fairly unrealistic - 23/02/2012 04:54:44 PM 1391 Views
Not entirely. - 23/02/2012 06:30:18 PM 1150 Views
On exempting SS income: - 25/02/2012 02:30:43 AM 1141 Views
Is there any reason why one should exclude the other? - 23/02/2012 07:32:09 PM 1223 Views

Reply to Message