Active Users:581 Time:18/03/2026 08:08:51 PM
Yes, I saw that. nossy Send a noteboard - 23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM
As I noted, Akins "OP" gave some, but not enough. Calling something rape does not mean it is; there is nothing outrageous in that.

Unless you say something about some sort of mental handicap, you're really not adding context; you're changing the subject.

A federal ban on rape, without exception, is in the GOP platform, nossy. EVP today reached the same conclusion I did: "While virtually every powerful Republican from Mitt Romney on down has called on Akin to resign his nomination, now the platform committee is committed to exactly the same thing Akin proposed. This makes it quite clear that they aren't actually against what he said, just the way he worded it." Maybe that is just pandering but they really truly mean it—honest!—when stating views you share; the opposite is at least as likely. I suggest examining the platform party members and leaders approved to see how much you support, because odds are it reflects what President Romneys policies would be (that is, after all, why platforms exist.)

Holy crap. Please stop treating me like I do not know stuff. Of course I have thoughts on it, but we aren't talking about his definition of rape, so please stop hijacking this discussion. His comment re: the female body can be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard w/o me having to jump on the REPUBLICANS HAVE A PLATFORM I DON'T LIKE soapbox.

Reply to message
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off - 22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM 1135 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest. - 22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM 719 Views
Erm... what on earth is that? - 22/08/2012 11:19:13 PM 520 Views
Celebrity Big Brother in the UK - 22/08/2012 11:22:17 PM 574 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate - 23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM 669 Views
Bullshit - 23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM 573 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway - 23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM 616 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic. - 23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM 890 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments - 24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM 527 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way. - 24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM 600 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too - 24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM 614 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led. - 24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM 693 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary - 24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM 641 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either. - 24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM 820 Views
I'm not even sure what that means - 25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM 539 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads. - 25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM 600 Views
Okay, we're done here - 26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM 575 Views
Quotes are not my opinion. - 26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM 537 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education. - 26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM 646 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually? - 27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM 665 Views
T^T - 27/08/2012 04:39:33 AM 589 Views
Is that the emoticon for perky titties? *NM* - 27/08/2012 11:07:06 PM 284 Views
He is an absolute berk. *NM* - 23/08/2012 01:08:58 AM 483 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments. - 23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM 657 Views
Really? *NM* - 23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM 358 Views
Yeah. - 23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM 600 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response. - 23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM 597 Views
Heh, I didn't think so. - 23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM 633 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context. - 23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM 734 Views
Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM 543 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM 575 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM 553 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries. - 23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM 579 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air - 23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM 633 Views
No argument there. - 23/08/2012 11:46:01 PM 607 Views
This - 23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM 626 Views
Okay. I misunderstood. Sorry. *NM* - 23/08/2012 09:58:20 PM 328 Views
Eh - 23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM 575 Views
Well, I didn't take it that way. - 23/08/2012 10:42:01 PM 696 Views
Good - 24/08/2012 02:20:27 AM 655 Views
Ah, I can understand if that is the case. - 23/08/2012 07:46:38 PM 602 Views
I read it the same way Jen did - 23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM 553 Views
Why? - 23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM 615 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it. - 23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM 612 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely. - 23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM 574 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule. - 23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM 595 Views
Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM 572 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM 543 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM 540 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM 634 Views
couple things - 24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM 539 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM 567 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:45:38 PM 519 Views
Re: couple things - 25/08/2012 12:11:03 AM 569 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange. - 24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM 557 Views
Ew. - 24/08/2012 06:56:27 PM 581 Views
Yes, that about covers it. - 24/08/2012 07:42:13 PM 552 Views
Yes, I was talking about Galoway and what he said - 25/08/2012 12:15:15 AM 689 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:34:51 PM 640 Views
I can - 23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM 508 Views
I gotta say I am with Paul - 24/08/2012 12:27:44 AM 607 Views
Hm. - 24/08/2012 02:08:33 AM 527 Views
OK - 23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM 562 Views
Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM 518 Views
Re: Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM 711 Views
To start again then Joel - 23/08/2012 11:14:07 PM 541 Views
My mistake then, sorry. - 23/08/2012 11:32:34 PM 575 Views
Agreeing without agreeing. - 23/08/2012 12:24:10 PM 655 Views
I have gotten used to you being right for the wrong reasons. - 23/08/2012 07:42:32 PM 561 Views
Yes - 23/08/2012 06:34:38 AM 704 Views
Indeed - 23/08/2012 08:47:40 PM 531 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets - 23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM 628 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit - 23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM 565 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned - 24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM 550 Views
well, that is where I'm confused. - 24/08/2012 07:03:16 PM 581 Views
Maybe I watch to much CNN - 24/08/2012 07:30:23 PM 520 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well. - 24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM 594 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate. - 24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM 757 Views
Interesting. - 24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM 538 Views
no it isn't kinda true - 24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM 516 Views

Reply to Message