Active Users:276 Time:16/09/2025 09:51:31 PM
Re: Well, I have to clarify... snoopcester Send a noteboard - 23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM
I think Paul is right on at least one point - no, I do not think people should have sex with someone's body whenever they want, but I do think it could be gray area on whether you have consent, especially if both people are sleepy and one doesn't realize the other isn't awake. I would like to be able to say anything with certainty, but I am not sure we can say he was entirely in his right mind and that he would have sexed her up no matter what. Joel is also partly right, that if we're going to assume innocence rather than guilt, we do have to take his position seriously. At any rate, ew, I'm tired of thinking about this guy and his sleepy sex.


I bolded the bit I don't disagree with, and I think I already said that?
I do think that if it is a one night stand in particular, then people should be very careful to make sure the other person is consenting to what they are doing or it is rape and I would say starting to have sex with them when they are asleep is very much rape regardless of consenting to an earlier sex act.

Joel has just confused the whole thing, I think, by replying to what he wants to reply to rather than the actual post I made and he seemed to be replying to (Paul is also, I think, guilty of this to an extent).
I wasn't, as I'm sure you realise, posting about the guilt or not of Assange but about the comment on rape by George Galloway, who was quite clear in his view that once a woman has consented to sex then it isn't rape to have sex with her once she is asleep.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off - 22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM 1081 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest. - 22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM 650 Views
Erm... what on earth is that? - 22/08/2012 11:19:13 PM 470 Views
Celebrity Big Brother in the UK - 22/08/2012 11:22:17 PM 514 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate - 23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM 619 Views
Bullshit - 23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM 522 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway - 23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM 546 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic. - 23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM 788 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments - 24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM 479 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way. - 24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM 546 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too - 24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM 557 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led. - 24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM 638 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary - 24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM 590 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either. - 24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM 761 Views
I'm not even sure what that means - 25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM 484 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads. - 25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM 556 Views
Okay, we're done here - 26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM 518 Views
Quotes are not my opinion. - 26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM 491 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education. - 26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM 584 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually? - 27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM 613 Views
T^T - 27/08/2012 04:39:33 AM 539 Views
Is that the emoticon for perky titties? *NM* - 27/08/2012 11:07:06 PM 260 Views
He is an absolute berk. *NM* - 23/08/2012 01:08:58 AM 465 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments. - 23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM 606 Views
Really? *NM* - 23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM 340 Views
Yeah. - 23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM 548 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response. - 23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM 541 Views
Heh, I didn't think so. - 23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM 588 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context. - 23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM 678 Views
Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM 494 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM 523 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM 498 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries. - 23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM 528 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air - 23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM 569 Views
No argument there. - 23/08/2012 11:46:01 PM 555 Views
This - 23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM 575 Views
Okay. I misunderstood. Sorry. *NM* - 23/08/2012 09:58:20 PM 309 Views
Eh - 23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM 513 Views
Well, I didn't take it that way. - 23/08/2012 10:42:01 PM 625 Views
Good - 24/08/2012 02:20:27 AM 595 Views
Ah, I can understand if that is the case. - 23/08/2012 07:46:38 PM 548 Views
I read it the same way Jen did - 23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM 480 Views
Why? - 23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM 562 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it. - 23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM 555 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely. - 23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM 522 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule. - 23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM 539 Views
Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM 508 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM 474 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM 484 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM 582 Views
couple things - 24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM 485 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM 519 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:45:38 PM 469 Views
Re: couple things - 25/08/2012 12:11:03 AM 514 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange. - 24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM 496 Views
Ew. - 24/08/2012 06:56:27 PM 531 Views
Yes, that about covers it. - 24/08/2012 07:42:13 PM 504 Views
Yes, I was talking about Galoway and what he said - 25/08/2012 12:15:15 AM 638 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:34:51 PM 572 Views
I can - 23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM 455 Views
I gotta say I am with Paul - 24/08/2012 12:27:44 AM 553 Views
Hm. - 24/08/2012 02:08:33 AM 473 Views
OK - 23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM 501 Views
Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM 467 Views
Re: Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM 661 Views
To start again then Joel - 23/08/2012 11:14:07 PM 491 Views
My mistake then, sorry. - 23/08/2012 11:32:34 PM 523 Views
Agreeing without agreeing. - 23/08/2012 12:24:10 PM 582 Views
I have gotten used to you being right for the wrong reasons. - 23/08/2012 07:42:32 PM 498 Views
Yes - 23/08/2012 06:34:38 AM 652 Views
Indeed - 23/08/2012 08:47:40 PM 478 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets - 23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM 577 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit - 23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM 495 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned - 24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM 496 Views
well, that is where I'm confused. - 24/08/2012 07:03:16 PM 528 Views
Maybe I watch to much CNN - 24/08/2012 07:30:23 PM 472 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well. - 24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM 545 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate. - 24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM 703 Views
Interesting. - 24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM 485 Views
no it isn't kinda true - 24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM 466 Views

Reply to Message