Active Users:195 Time:01/05/2024 12:18:00 AM
Damage to cycling? LMAO good one! *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 24/08/2012 03:23:48 PM
So, Armstrong has announced he won't fight the USDA's doping charges against him after failing in attempts to use the courts to block the USDA investigation.

Shame for the damage he has done to the sport of cycling and the careers he has damaged along the way to this point. I imagine the reason he isn't fighting the accusations is to try to cling to what he can of his reputation because he knows the weight of evidence against him is impossible to deny now.

Edit: Excellent article on is here -

http://inrng.com/2012/08/lance-armstrong-quits/#more-10570
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat. - 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM 1389 Views
You mean giving up in disgust after relentless hounding? - 24/08/2012 11:34:05 AM 705 Views
No, I meant what I said - 24/08/2012 12:08:05 PM 788 Views
Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM 657 Views
Re: Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM 923 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong? - 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM 685 Views
No. Can you please reread what I actually wrote. - 25/08/2012 09:46:47 AM 598 Views
Snoop = hypocrite - great job random! *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:27:38 PM 373 Views
Damage to cycling? LMAO good one! *NM* - 24/08/2012 03:23:48 PM 320 Views
Yea I choked up a bit when I read that - 25/08/2012 12:09:13 AM 697 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped... - 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM 671 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM 716 Views
I don't. - 24/08/2012 11:51:14 PM 717 Views
Oh come on. - 25/08/2012 01:18:18 AM 889 Views
Yes? - 25/08/2012 10:07:34 AM 779 Views
No. - 25/08/2012 12:53:49 PM 790 Views
Oh. - 26/08/2012 05:28:50 PM 789 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty - 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM 621 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM 708 Views
Re: That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 05:32:38 PM 687 Views
It is not proof, only far from conclusive evidence. - 26/08/2012 11:02:38 PM 714 Views
I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:53:04 PM 701 Views
Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM 780 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM* - 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM 333 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying - 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM 609 Views
Nevermind, saw your post up above *NM* - 25/08/2012 01:05:03 AM 344 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that? - 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM 820 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice. - 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM 696 Views
You are a very small-minded person. - 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM 699 Views
And you are a very annoying person. - 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM 720 Views
In the immortal words of Anonymous2000 ... "+1" - 25/08/2012 06:32:10 PM 788 Views
-1 - 25/08/2012 10:23:25 PM 633 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events - 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM 778 Views
Heh. This exchange is reminding me of Yes, Minister. - 25/08/2012 10:04:59 PM 649 Views
I've actually seen that show - 26/08/2012 05:33:31 AM 739 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate - 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM 586 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree - 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM 643 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 26/08/2012 05:47:36 PM 362 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer - 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM 639 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema - 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM 531 Views
but that's just dumb *NM* - 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM 430 Views
Well - 27/08/2012 09:32:30 AM 896 Views
On that first point - 27/08/2012 10:37:34 AM 736 Views

Reply to Message