Active Users:612 Time:27/10/2026 07:36:33 PM
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense. snoopcester Send a noteboard - 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM
and i'm going to keep insisting you're a baby puncher until you finally decide you're not posting here ever again. after that, we're deleting every post you ever made throughout history. i don't have any solid evidence of your baby punching but these 10 people say you did it so it *must* be true....

lance armstrong, as i understand it, is basically taking his ball and going home. arbitration is heavily favored for USADA, why should he subject himself to something he is destined to lose whether or not he actually did the deed -- something they can't consistently prove with solid evidence despite having years of samples. and yes, he tested positive one time but got doctor's clearance because of steroids related to his chemotherapy treatment. i'm not really seeing the whole "ruin the sport" angle, but you keep on with your crusade since it obviously gives you so much pleasure to do so


One thing though, just so you know, you are wrong about the failed test. You probably want to read up on it if you are going to comment.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat. - 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM 1880 Views
You mean giving up in disgust after relentless hounding? - 24/08/2012 11:34:05 AM 1177 Views
No, I meant what I said - 24/08/2012 12:08:05 PM 1263 Views
Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM 1128 Views
Re: Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM 1398 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong? - 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM 1137 Views
No. Can you please reread what I actually wrote. - 25/08/2012 09:46:47 AM 1061 Views
Snoop = hypocrite - great job random! *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:27:38 PM 626 Views
Damage to cycling? LMAO good one! *NM* - 24/08/2012 03:23:48 PM 564 Views
Yea I choked up a bit when I read that - 25/08/2012 12:09:13 AM 1176 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped... - 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM 1112 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM 1181 Views
I don't. - 24/08/2012 11:51:14 PM 1189 Views
Oh come on. - 25/08/2012 01:18:18 AM 1355 Views
Yes? - 25/08/2012 10:07:34 AM 1276 Views
No. - 25/08/2012 12:53:49 PM 1309 Views
Oh. - 26/08/2012 05:28:50 PM 1308 Views
And this is why doping must be vigorously and strictly punished. - 25/08/2012 11:50:52 PM 1255 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty - 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM 1075 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM 1166 Views
Re: That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 05:32:38 PM 1165 Views
It is not proof, only far from conclusive evidence. - 26/08/2012 11:02:38 PM 1205 Views
I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:53:04 PM 1201 Views
Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM 1274 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM* - 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM 610 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying - 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM 1115 Views
Nevermind, saw your post up above *NM* - 25/08/2012 01:05:03 AM 606 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that? - 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM 1300 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice. - 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM 1209 Views
You are a very small-minded person. - 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM 1202 Views
And you are a very annoying person. - 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM 1154 Views
In the immortal words of Anonymous2000 ... "+1" - 25/08/2012 06:32:10 PM 1320 Views
-1 - 25/08/2012 10:23:25 PM 1075 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events - 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM 1227 Views
Heh. This exchange is reminding me of Yes, Minister. - 25/08/2012 10:04:59 PM 1135 Views
I've actually seen that show - 26/08/2012 05:33:31 AM 1219 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate - 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM 1043 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree - 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM 1103 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 26/08/2012 05:47:36 PM 622 Views
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here - 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM 1152 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM 593 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense. - 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM 1039 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer - 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM 1124 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema - 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM 1013 Views
but that's just dumb *NM* - 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM 683 Views
I'd guess it is a sign of the drive to win needed to be a top sportsperson - 26/08/2012 10:51:20 PM 1071 Views
Well - 27/08/2012 09:32:30 AM 1520 Views
On that first point - 27/08/2012 10:37:34 AM 1217 Views

Reply to Message