yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
moondog Send a noteboard - 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
from the sound of it, he opposed the bill because it would have not given protections for legally allowed abortions under the law. i'm not sure that is an inconsistent position for obama, and certainly does not equate to the same type of shock as mourdock's rape pregnancy comment. it's not like obama is forcing people to get abortions or telling them they should be thankful god intended for them to get pregnant after they were raped after all....
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
God Distances Self From Christian Right
- 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM
1421 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM
431 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization."
- 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM
717 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is....
- 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM
914 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin?
- 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM
759 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but...
- 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM
750 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. 
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
810 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
810 Views
Your lack of scientific understanding is everything in this instance.
- 26/10/2012 10:44:05 PM
763 Views
Because whether God intends rape is aaaall about science, right?
- 26/10/2012 11:08:16 PM
667 Views
You're getting rather emphatic.
- 26/10/2012 11:27:07 PM
720 Views
Broad fundamental change to US law by controlling all three branches of government provokes that.
- 27/10/2012 12:44:59 AM
744 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this.
- 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM
781 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect
- 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM
814 Views
So we legalize an illegal act because some are willing to harm themselves to do it? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 10:02:37 PM
416 Views
no, we legalize the act so that it can be performed safely without killing both mother *and* child *NM*
- 26/10/2012 11:08:52 PM
407 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no.
- 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM
731 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals
- 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM
756 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive.
- 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM
797 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all...
- 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM
796 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal
- 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM
734 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are.
- 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM
859 Views
This isn't necessarily true, though it is often due to other factors.
- 27/10/2012 02:48:00 PM
754 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient."
- 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM
712 Views
Telling a woman whose life was in danger not to save it with abortion condemned her to die
- 26/10/2012 10:48:53 PM
710 Views
There is no proof that you would accept that a fetus is a child.
- 26/10/2012 11:31:50 PM
696 Views
Fantastic question.
- 26/10/2012 11:43:51 PM
722 Views
No, I would err on the side of caution; have often said as much in just those words.
- 27/10/2012 01:18:19 AM
714 Views
Sure there is; show me a fetus acting indepedently and consciously.
- 27/10/2012 01:15:00 AM
777 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism
- 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM
808 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative
- 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM
773 Views
yeah, but what do women know about women's issues? this is man talk time!
- 26/10/2012 05:01:58 PM
754 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment.
- 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM
715 Views
Or it could mean....
- 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM
750 Views
Having addressed this in response to Legolas in moondogs thread on Mourdock, I will just link that.
- 27/10/2012 01:43:48 AM
755 Views
I agree
- 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM
790 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend.
- 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM
748 Views
There is a logically consistent way; you did not ask for it, so I will be brief.
- 27/10/2012 02:53:09 AM
766 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause.
- 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM
752 Views
God intends everything.
- 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM
830 Views
"Intends" is a big word.
- 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM
748 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM*
- 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM
390 Views
that's probably because it's more relevant to most people's lives *NM*
- 26/10/2012 06:06:10 PM
401 Views
This entire scandal really speaks to the Calvinist heresy in particular.
- 26/10/2012 07:10:38 PM
718 Views
I was trying REALLY hard to avoid putting it in precisely those terms. 
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
767 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
767 Views
Well, but really, the fundamental crux of the issue is precisely that.
- 27/10/2012 01:03:26 AM
730 Views
True, but disputing founding articles of faith benefits from tact.
- 27/10/2012 02:02:48 AM
682 Views
Come on, Tom.
- 27/10/2012 03:29:39 AM
730 Views
I believe HE grasps the difference between predestination and determinism well.
- 27/10/2012 09:33:14 PM
771 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM*
- 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM
391 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads.
- 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM
716 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the
- 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM
727 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent?
- 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM
716 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM
395 Views
[citation needed]
- 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM
683 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM
401 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
- 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
750 Views
The BAIPA became federal law 2 years before Obamas Senate win; he says he would have voted for it.
- 27/10/2012 02:33:26 AM
710 Views
Once he started taking fire for it he said he would have voted for it? Well that clears that up.
- 27/10/2012 07:09:21 AM
898 Views
He "took fire" for a federal law passed before he was in Congress?
- 27/10/2012 04:08:25 PM
805 Views
amazing
- 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
853 Views
Women are certainly encouraged to weigh in, but everyone is entitled to thoughts on the matter
- 28/10/2012 02:22:55 PM
719 Views