He "took fire" for a federal law passed before he was in Congress?
Joel Send a noteboard - 27/10/2012 04:08:25 PM
Born Alive Infant Protection Act, an act that allows a physician to be able to nourish a viable baby that survives an abortion and is alive outside the womb? Or are you only outraged when republican's do evil?
Or can only conservative be wrong by definition?
Or can only conservative be wrong by definition?
Talk is cheap, but you cannot condemn a vote he did not cast against a law passed before he was elected. He did vote against an IL state version NOT restritect to viable fetuses, due to fears that would invalidate all abortion. On the IL Senate floor, he stated,
Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – a child, a nine-month-old – child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute.
State law already requires IL doctors apply every measure to save aborted VIABLE fetuses born alive (i.e. babies.) This bill would have required the same for NON-VIABLE fetuses, on the grounds they are people. Of course, if the law says non-viable fetuses are people, then all abortion is murder, and thus illegal.
The IL and federal bills were not the same, because IL law already requires doctors make every effort to save viable fetuses born alive. The IL bill declared NON-viable fetuses people, which would have made abortion itself illegal.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
God Distances Self From Christian Right
- 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM
1350 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM
400 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization."
- 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM
660 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is....
- 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM
851 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin?
- 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM
700 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but...
- 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM
678 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. 
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
754 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
754 Views
Your lack of scientific understanding is everything in this instance.
- 26/10/2012 10:44:05 PM
694 Views
Because whether God intends rape is aaaall about science, right?
- 26/10/2012 11:08:16 PM
614 Views
You're getting rather emphatic.
- 26/10/2012 11:27:07 PM
671 Views
Broad fundamental change to US law by controlling all three branches of government provokes that.
- 27/10/2012 12:44:59 AM
683 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this.
- 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM
723 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect
- 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM
755 Views
So we legalize an illegal act because some are willing to harm themselves to do it? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 10:02:37 PM
377 Views
no, we legalize the act so that it can be performed safely without killing both mother *and* child *NM*
- 26/10/2012 11:08:52 PM
380 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no.
- 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM
677 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals
- 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM
707 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive.
- 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM
727 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all...
- 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM
743 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal
- 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM
659 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are.
- 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM
803 Views
This isn't necessarily true, though it is often due to other factors.
- 27/10/2012 02:48:00 PM
702 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient."
- 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM
645 Views
Telling a woman whose life was in danger not to save it with abortion condemned her to die
- 26/10/2012 10:48:53 PM
645 Views
There is no proof that you would accept that a fetus is a child.
- 26/10/2012 11:31:50 PM
645 Views
Fantastic question.
- 26/10/2012 11:43:51 PM
675 Views
No, I would err on the side of caution; have often said as much in just those words.
- 27/10/2012 01:18:19 AM
657 Views
Sure there is; show me a fetus acting indepedently and consciously.
- 27/10/2012 01:15:00 AM
701 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism
- 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM
753 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative
- 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM
718 Views
yeah, but what do women know about women's issues? this is man talk time!
- 26/10/2012 05:01:58 PM
682 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment.
- 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM
651 Views
Or it could mean....
- 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM
690 Views
Having addressed this in response to Legolas in moondogs thread on Mourdock, I will just link that.
- 27/10/2012 01:43:48 AM
702 Views
I agree
- 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM
743 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend.
- 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM
693 Views
There is a logically consistent way; you did not ask for it, so I will be brief.
- 27/10/2012 02:53:09 AM
691 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause.
- 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM
696 Views
God intends everything.
- 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM
773 Views
"Intends" is a big word.
- 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM
694 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM*
- 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM
357 Views
that's probably because it's more relevant to most people's lives *NM*
- 26/10/2012 06:06:10 PM
377 Views
This entire scandal really speaks to the Calvinist heresy in particular.
- 26/10/2012 07:10:38 PM
668 Views
I was trying REALLY hard to avoid putting it in precisely those terms. 
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
712 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
712 Views
Well, but really, the fundamental crux of the issue is precisely that.
- 27/10/2012 01:03:26 AM
678 Views
True, but disputing founding articles of faith benefits from tact.
- 27/10/2012 02:02:48 AM
626 Views
Come on, Tom.
- 27/10/2012 03:29:39 AM
662 Views
I believe HE grasps the difference between predestination and determinism well.
- 27/10/2012 09:33:14 PM
716 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM*
- 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM
368 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads.
- 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM
660 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the
- 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM
674 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent?
- 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM
665 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM
370 Views
[citation needed]
- 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM
628 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM
360 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
- 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
682 Views
The BAIPA became federal law 2 years before Obamas Senate win; he says he would have voted for it.
- 27/10/2012 02:33:26 AM
658 Views
Once he started taking fire for it he said he would have voted for it? Well that clears that up.
- 27/10/2012 07:09:21 AM
846 Views
He "took fire" for a federal law passed before he was in Congress?
- 27/10/2012 04:08:25 PM
743 Views
amazing
- 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
789 Views
Women are certainly encouraged to weigh in, but everyone is entitled to thoughts on the matter
- 28/10/2012 02:22:55 PM
664 Views