Active Users:597 Time:18/03/2026 02:04:32 PM
Nothing will ever truly end the debate, but we can greatly reduce or end its justification. Joel Send a noteboard - 22/12/2012 08:03:39 PM
cost would be the main one. I don't know how many schools there are in the US, but having at least one armed police officer at every one? You're talking billions at the very least.

Another case where the level of justified public debate about gun violence strongly suggests the cost would be more than worth it.

The evidence based on events like Columbine suggests it wouldn't, if it doesn't then that's quite a waste of 10% of your education budget.

As I noted in response to Novo, the novel appearance of armed police in US high schools coincided suspiciously well with Columbine. So, no, armed police in high schools did not prevent Columbine for the very simple reason armed police were virtually non-existent in US high schools prior to Columbine. They became ubiquitous promptly thereafter, which may be part of why the Newtown shooter attacked an elementary rather than junior or high school.

It is difficult to imagine armed police at schools would not dramatically reduce the incidence of school shootings. The only question is whether the current frequency and mortality of school shootings justifies the expense of greatly reducing or completely preventing them. I believe we are past the point of debating that.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
the NRA shows it is an asylum overrun by lunatics - 22/12/2012 04:40:26 PM 1439 Views
I do not see why calling for armed cops at schools is an unreasonable response. - 22/12/2012 04:53:06 PM 971 Views
I can think of two reasons off the top of my head - 22/12/2012 05:38:19 PM 974 Views
OK... - 22/12/2012 06:58:42 PM 959 Views
If someone is shooting at you having a gun to shoot back seems like a good idea - 26/12/2012 06:10:07 PM 806 Views
The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:13:30 PM 851 Views
Re: The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:59:36 PM 930 Views
If you think it would solve the debate then probably - 22/12/2012 07:09:42 PM 904 Views
Nothing will ever truly end the debate, but we can greatly reduce or end its justification. - 22/12/2012 08:03:39 PM 868 Views
If it's shown to work - 23/12/2012 12:25:38 AM 956 Views
columbine had two armed guards on the day of the shooting. they were both immediately fired upon... - 23/12/2012 12:49:30 AM 816 Views
I have never seen any mention of them among the injured or dead (or at all.) - 23/12/2012 01:09:38 AM 967 Views
A fuller account of Gardner - 23/12/2012 10:27:24 AM 1038 Views
Nice link. - 23/12/2012 02:27:30 PM 803 Views
Re: Nice link. - 23/12/2012 03:15:24 PM 821 Views
at last count, over 99,000 schools in the US - 23/12/2012 12:45:30 AM 902 Views
What is public safety worth to you? - 23/12/2012 12:54:04 AM 824 Views
it's not entirely a matter of cost, although that factors into it. - 23/12/2012 01:01:50 AM 744 Views
There are many cases where armed cops ended mass shootings. - 23/12/2012 01:28:25 AM 756 Views
there are none where an armed guard placed there *before* the shooting had any effect - 23/12/2012 01:36:42 AM 891 Views
Kind of a Catch-22; if they PREVENT shootings, shootings can only occur in their absence. - 23/12/2012 01:52:03 AM 933 Views
ok, here is my last word on the subject - 23/12/2012 02:06:49 AM 867 Views
9 people injured vs. 20 people dead. - 23/12/2012 02:34:00 AM 800 Views
it is still "more guns makes us safer" which has yet to prevent a single massacre in this country - 23/12/2012 02:41:56 PM 905 Views
Peter Odighizuwa comes to mind, that's also horrible logic - 23/12/2012 08:27:46 PM 811 Views
[citation needed] - 25/12/2012 04:54:14 PM 795 Views
Fair enough - 25/12/2012 09:06:43 PM 1176 Views
It doesn't have to be a full time gaurd standing looking dangerous. - 26/12/2012 06:12:14 PM 896 Views
People die from all sort of causes - 22/12/2012 07:27:53 PM 877 Views
Cars require training, certification and licensing, too; why should guns not? - 22/12/2012 08:25:43 PM 1002 Views
Do bombs require certification? - 22/12/2012 09:21:25 PM 1112 Views
i say this with all due respect -- eat a bag of dicks - 23/12/2012 01:04:08 AM 880 Views
That was pretty damn respectful under the circumstances. - 23/12/2012 01:10:04 AM 840 Views
The lack of intellect displayed here is to be expected - 23/12/2012 04:01:32 AM 862 Views
so according to you we should just make life illegal since everyone is going to die from something.. - 23/12/2012 07:25:05 AM 793 Views
Obviously you didn't put pay attention - 23/12/2012 01:40:17 PM 823 Views
no, you said "fuck it because people die anyway". there is a big difference - 23/12/2012 02:46:46 PM 764 Views
As usual, you are wrong on so many fronts... - 27/12/2012 10:39:04 PM 1089 Views
Dicks and stones - 23/12/2012 03:54:25 AM 1022 Views
FYI - I gave moondog a 30-day time-out via the ignore function. - 23/12/2012 05:48:13 AM 736 Views
FYI -- you didn't post to this board for 30+ days - 23/12/2012 07:21:44 AM 766 Views
I'm not sure it's about guns. - 23/12/2012 06:08:50 PM 815 Views

Reply to Message