Active Users:304 Time:06/05/2024 12:09:55 PM
Re: moral has nothing to do with it, imho Isaac Send a noteboard - 08/01/2013 05:40:46 AM
Beyond that I obviously don't want us to have less guns, I have to point out that with 200+ million guns the price of a a buy back would easy run mid two to low three digits of billions. And most studies I have seen have shown that it doesn't effect crime rates much.

are you assuming getting fair market value for each gun? maybe then it would run into the hundreds of billions. and that's assuming a buy back of every single gun in circulation. it's not necessary to buy back every single gun, just the ones people want to part with. as you are always so quick to point out, we still have a constitutional right to keep guns in this country. there is no scenario i can imagine where the government would buy back every single gun in existence. as i've said before, the concept is to minimize the destructiveness of having so many guns in circulation, not to forcibly take everyone's guns away from them if they are responsible owners.


If we're not buying back the majority of them, and thus not straining the budget much, then one has difficulty seeing how a limited buy back would eliminate having so many guns in circulation. San Francisco did one of these, got 400 guns, don't know how many are in San Fran, probably less than the nearly 1:1 ratio country-wide, but even if it were a tenth the normal we'd still be talking about a program that accounted for less than 1 in 1000 of the guns in the city. You seem to be suggesting a token program that burns money to no purpose.

also, i would argue that previous prohibitions have not worked in the US because they have not been done very thoughtfully. the "war on drugs" being one of the biggest prohibition failures in our history but yet we keep on trying the same failed policies and expecting different results. i don't think it's fair to keep throwing our hands up after each gun death and saying "we can't do anything about it". arming everyone will never be the correct solution.

You're making a case by assertion there, not backing it up with data and facts. You might consider this stuff obvious but it isn't to me, I am not against prohibition on guns, booze, drugs, etc out of hand, but I'm not much of a fan and I like to see evidence it would be effective. To me, from what I have seen, gun prohibitions have not been effective, and have even been counter-effective when you pull the rug off the hidden dust of prevented crimes, which the gun control crowd seems to do everything it can to ignore. Why is this type of prohibition more effective then others? What evidence is there?

the problem with comparing crime statistics is that there is no country in the world with as many guns per capita as the US. likewise, some states with a large number of guns (over 30% saturation) are not reporting reliable stats on their violent crime. we are talking violent crime, after all, not petty crime. there is no doubt that a lot of petty crime is prevented on a daily basis, but i would argue that non-lethal petty crime is a preferable alternative to the idea that one could be gunned down at any moment if we allow even more guns into our society. if you want data, it is already hard enough to come by in our own country, much less other ones. i honestly don't have time to compile something we could both analyze, and i'm not sure you'd be convinced anyway. in this case "let's just give up" might be the only option :P


I just don't see that petty crime as minor. Still, you are likely right on this being a futile conversation, neither of us a raging fanatic convinced the other is a drooling idiot nor are either of us likely to budge, so we are probably wasting our mutual breath. You have presented good arguments, but I do not find them compelling. I imagine you feel vice-versa about the latter and hopefully the former as well.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Poll: 54 percent view NRA favorably - 28/12/2012 04:23:35 AM 914 Views
Hahahaha. That is full of shit. OMG. Thanks for the laughs. *NM* - 28/12/2012 06:30:08 AM 375 Views
I have this to say about that... - 28/12/2012 07:10:52 AM 710 Views
That was rather long but probably one of the best things I've read this year - 28/12/2012 02:31:24 PM 490 Views
Excellent article by a knowledgable individual armed with facts. *NM* - 28/12/2012 04:36:23 PM 244 Views
See my response to Novo. - 28/12/2012 06:28:00 PM 577 Views
please cite the errors, manipulations, or lies. - 28/12/2012 09:30:28 PM 526 Views
Great read, thanks for posting! *NM* - 28/12/2012 05:52:29 PM 248 Views
Thanks for posting that, I enjoyed it a lot - 29/12/2012 01:36:33 AM 497 Views
his premise is "there's already too many guns so why bother trying anything at all now" - 07/01/2013 06:27:20 PM 562 Views
I don't think that's his sole premise but it's also quite true - 07/01/2013 07:05:20 PM 593 Views
i think you're missing a piece of the puzzle - 07/01/2013 07:23:02 PM 512 Views
I'm not missing it, I just don't think it's wise or especially moral - 07/01/2013 09:36:05 PM 555 Views
moral has nothing to do with it, imho - 07/01/2013 11:26:00 PM 604 Views
Re: moral has nothing to do with it, imho - 08/01/2013 05:40:46 AM 480 Views
last thoughts..... - 08/01/2013 05:18:35 PM 497 Views
Well I was referring more to the timing of collecting data. - 29/12/2012 04:28:01 AM 687 Views
Is that the same Gallup that said 54% of America would vote Romney? - 28/12/2012 06:15:43 PM 602 Views
Once again data is data.....feel free to cite other polling data. *NM* - 28/12/2012 06:38:29 PM 263 Views

Reply to Message