Active Users:1489 Time:17/12/2025 03:28:47 AM
From the way you're shitting yourself with glee, I'm going to say Social Security. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/03/2013 12:45:50 AM

View original post
Hint: Many Republicans call it an unaffordable failure that must be ended ere it bankrupt America. This despite the whole US government openly mooching off its positive cashflow from 1981-2010, and its $2.7 trillion POSITIVE balance (17% of total US debt) being Americas largest single creditor, twice over. The program is said to have been mathematically impossible from the outset, despite being older than most people using it. It is accused of unsustainability, even though its counterparts still work well in most other industrialized nations, including Germany, France, the UK, Canada and Mexico, whose combined life expectancy and population exceed Americas. Can you name this wildly successful US federal program falsely called a "boondoggle"...?

IIRC that money has all been spent on other stuff, so it's not like we're all good to go. Of course it's going to take in more than it puts out. Bernie Madoff did the same thing. So did Charles Ponzi. Doesn't mean we're going to be able to afford to pay off the Baby Boomers without printing money...D'oh!

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years? - 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM 1500 Views
From the way you're shitting yourself with glee, I'm going to say Social Security. - 01/03/2013 12:45:50 AM 1094 Views
Hot dog, we have a wiener! - 01/03/2013 01:40:18 AM 1067 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it. - 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM 928 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM 1024 Views
Good lord my friend..... - 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM 952 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it. - 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM 1018 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM* - 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM 524 Views
Yes he did. He has very poor reading comprehension skills. *NM* - 03/03/2013 01:07:59 AM 541 Views
I really do not think I did. - 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM 1047 Views
I'm pretty confident you have - 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM 1023 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme. - 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM 949 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that - 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM 1130 Views
It is neither an investment nor fraudulent. - 12/03/2013 02:34:09 AM 1186 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by - 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM 968 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? - 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM 1000 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them - 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM 993 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return... - 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM 923 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it? - 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM 1082 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM 901 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill. - 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM 959 Views
Here are some clues. - 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM 834 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not. - 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM 971 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't - 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM 1093 Views
Indeed. - 11/03/2013 09:53:59 PM 1010 Views
Re: Indeed. - 13/03/2013 05:00:10 PM 1143 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement - 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM 855 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything? - 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM 930 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? - 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM 1017 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there. - 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM 939 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM 1068 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented. - 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM 997 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM 1043 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM 923 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this.... - 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM 1228 Views
No loss. - 13/03/2013 04:37:41 PM 867 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile? - 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM 931 Views
spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 06/03/2013 12:54:38 AM 887 Views
Re: spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 08/03/2013 03:04:37 PM 942 Views
I was not trolling, but clarifying. - 11/03/2013 09:53:48 PM 996 Views

Reply to Message