1: It was a mathematics example to illustrate how crappy Social Security actually serves the people. Besides, Social Security already takes 15% (7.5 directly form the individual), my example only shows what COULD have been done with just 4% (using all 15% the value is almost $5 million). As for showing the math, I have already given you all the variables and you can find the formulas on the web easily, though it is just as easy to find a calculator and skip the math by hand.
2: Contrary to what you believe (I seriously doubt you know very much at all about it) long term investing in the "evil" stock market (most easily through mutual funds) provides easily predictable long term gains. Yes there are short term fluctuations, and also methods to deal with them (beginning with not putting any money in there that you might need in the next 5 years).
3: No we can not simply end Social Security tomorrow. But there are many different ideas on how to continue to support the people who foolishly allowed themselves to be dependent on it. Without trapping a brand new generation into something that is just simply BAD.
This message last edited by HyogaRott on 05/03/2013 at 02:33:04 PM
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years?
- 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM
1440 Views
Medicare? *NM*
- 28/02/2013 11:38:22 PM
610 Views
No, Medicare has only been around about half as long.
- 28/02/2013 11:56:32 PM
923 Views
Medicare has its own problems, and caused many more. You really do not want to have this debate.
- 03/03/2013 03:03:15 PM
856 Views
No, I do not, because Medicare and torts are invariably scapegoated for all problems with healthcare
- 04/03/2013 12:52:37 AM
915 Views
I can argue with anyone on this (and have) btut first we need to break out that dictionary
- 04/03/2013 04:45:06 AM
839 Views
I am sure you can and have; ability to form arguments does not automatically grant them validity.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:11 PM
915 Views
Like I said, short conversation, once everyone uses the same definitions.
- 13/03/2013 03:28:52 PM
914 Views
From the way you're shitting yourself with glee, I'm going to say Social Security.
- 01/03/2013 12:45:50 AM
1032 Views
Also unlike Ponzis, Social Security was not meant to profit—it just did anyway. For 75 years.
- 01/03/2013 01:55:46 AM
877 Views
It is a "Ponzi" by definition, any argument to the contrary just makes you look ignorant.
- 02/03/2013 12:02:46 PM
942 Views
Wait: An insurer is saying insurance is a Ponzi scheme? 
- 04/03/2013 12:56:30 AM
906 Views
- 04/03/2013 12:56:30 AM
906 Views
You are making even lese sense than usual... Quite an acomplishment. *NM*
- 04/03/2013 03:31:39 AM
539 Views
Maybe, but my math usually checks, and I never have to explain what I omitted.
- 11/03/2013 09:55:50 PM
997 Views
My math ALWAYS "checks" - it isn't personal, you are just making absolutely no sense, *NM*
- 13/03/2013 03:27:11 PM
480 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it.
- 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM
865 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. 
- 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM
963 Views
- 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM
963 Views
Good lord my friend.....
- 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM
904 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it.
- 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM
955 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM*
- 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM
488 Views
I really do not think I did.
- 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM
989 Views
I'm pretty confident you have
- 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM
973 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM
896 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that
- 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM
1077 Views
Re: Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis.
- 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM
963 Views
- 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM
963 Views
Fraud="money contributed is NOT invested for the contributor, but instead redistributed to others"?
- 04/03/2013 12:51:30 AM
899 Views
You can try and misrepresent what I have said all you want, you are still wrong.
- 04/03/2013 03:45:24 AM
963 Views
Dude, how is QUOTING you misrepresenting you?! And why must I ALWAYS ask that in these threads?
- 11/03/2013 09:56:18 PM
947 Views
- 11/03/2013 09:56:18 PM
947 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by
- 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM
918 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? 
- 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM
947 Views
- 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM
947 Views
I don't think I'd be telling them anything they don't already know... I mostly agree with them
- 02/03/2013 05:38:56 AM
1081 Views
Means testing is flat out WRONG, and the contribution limit is a sticky debate
- 02/03/2013 12:43:09 PM
877 Views
Tell that to him not me, I didn't express an opinion and my implied one obviously doesn't favor it
- 02/03/2013 05:28:14 PM
990 Views
I was, I just hit the repy under the wrong post. He was the first to bering the two topics up. *NM*
- 03/03/2013 04:09:34 AM
479 Views
It is insurance against old age poverty, not a longevity lottery.
- 04/03/2013 02:00:24 AM
979 Views
It is not insurance, it is a pension plan, that also contains an overpriced LT disability insurance.
- 04/03/2013 04:00:42 AM
977 Views
Social Security Insurance; says so right on the label.
- 11/03/2013 09:53:33 PM
1114 Views
You can call it BedroomWindowVitamins but it does not change what it acutally IS.
- 13/03/2013 04:34:42 PM
884 Views
"Sustainable"=/="profitable;" bankruptcy was not always a given, as your fellows claim..
- 04/03/2013 01:35:04 AM
880 Views
Sustainable often means profitable, they are not universally synonmous but both at once is ideal
- 04/03/2013 12:25:45 PM
866 Views
That is the IDEAL, but NOT point: Sustainability needs no profit, yet profit ensures sustainability.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:48 PM
1339 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them
- 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM
932 Views
An ironic charge, since their defenses of those ideals typically suffer from the same defect.
- 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM
904 Views
- 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM
904 Views
I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you. nyah, nyah, nyah
- 02/03/2013 12:58:10 PM
845 Views
"Unsustainable"=/="meeting monthly obligations for 75 YEARS and still having $2.5 trillion left."
- 04/03/2013 01:03:09 AM
969 Views
Please look up the definition of sustainable. Hint: "its worked so far" isn't it.
- 04/03/2013 04:25:19 AM
956 Views
"As it is currently constructed/funded" is one HELL of a qualifier.
- 04/03/2013 04:41:30 AM
991 Views
You just don't get it, or apparently are so in love with your political ideology you won't.
- 04/03/2013 04:58:15 AM
800 Views
I believe if you check civilizations record you will find the human population has steadily risen.
- 04/03/2013 05:08:38 AM
870 Views
*sigh*
- 04/03/2013 12:15:22 PM
867 Views
Birth RATES have fallen; POPULATION steadily rose in every period except the Black Deaths peak.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:36 PM
1166 Views
Ironic that you would make my point while arguing against
- 04/03/2013 06:12:29 PM
803 Views
?
- 11/03/2013 09:56:59 PM
977 Views
you mistate his posistion and then rationalize that you know what he really meant
- 13/03/2013 12:06:44 PM
826 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return...
- 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM
839 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it?
- 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM
1008 Views
*sigh*
- 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM
846 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill.
- 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM
904 Views
Here are some clues.
- 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM
788 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not.
- 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM
919 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't
- 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM
1032 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement
- 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM
800 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything?
- 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM
863 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means?
- 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM
927 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there.
- 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM
893 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once?
- 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM
1011 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented.
- 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM
943 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level....
- 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM
989 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level....
- 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM
856 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this....
- 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM
1156 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile?
- 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM
862 Views