View original post
View original post
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither. People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither. People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
in this case, what freedom specifically are you giving up or sacrificing? the new laws being proposed have zero to do with taking anyone's guns away unless they are a convicted felon or have other violent tendencies or mental illness. how does that infringe upon your individual right to keep and bear arms? are you suggesting that criminals and the criminally insane should have unfettered access to any and all weaponry available on the market?
also, how does a limit on how many bullets you can fire at one time count as sacrificing your freedoms? you still have your guns, you still are able to fire them, i'm not seeing where the sacrifice is coming from.
I injected the quote in regard to the horse trading comment.
Clip size does not really impact my freedoms severely, it is also just plain stupidity to pass such a law. Id does not prevent any crimes, nor does it impair anyone from firing a bunch of bullets. It is pure window dressing. I am just of the opinion that in the absence of a compelling reason to enact a law, one should not be.
US Senate Democrats - already cave-in on the gun control bill
- 19/03/2013 10:44:55 PM
1280 Views
right wingers are always point out there is no point legislating cosmetics
- 19/03/2013 11:52:28 PM
698 Views
You know, what you are hoping for will not make any difference whatsoever.....
- 20/03/2013 01:07:58 AM
546 Views
I can agree with some of what you stated, though I prefer "logical" to "right winger"
- 20/03/2013 01:56:34 AM
587 Views
you are correct. i forget sometimes that there **is** some common ground here....
- 20/03/2013 04:19:13 AM
532 Views
There'd be more common ground if anything were ever offered in exchange for concessions
- 20/03/2013 02:20:26 PM
562 Views
Ben Franklin said it best...
- 20/03/2013 04:14:45 PM
565 Views
interesting how that quote always applies to so many things, isn't it?
- 20/03/2013 05:14:30 PM
523 Views
Absolutely
- 21/03/2013 12:20:45 AM
598 Views
Re: Ben Franklin said it best...
- 21/03/2013 07:16:25 AM
628 Views
There can be NO negotiation, that is the point. This is a Constitutionally protected Right.
- 21/03/2013 01:03:54 PM
576 Views
Including Capital Letters in pronouncements do NOT make something so
- 21/03/2013 02:56:43 PM
575 Views
1st Amendment absolutism suggests libel and slander are unconstitutional.
- 21/03/2013 07:24:34 PM
562 Views
One person's rights end where another's begin, as you well know.
- 22/03/2013 02:38:37 AM
544 Views
all the same, none of the proposed laws truly infringe on your right to keep or use those guns....
- 22/03/2013 07:29:52 PM
584 Views
Apparently you did not read Feinstein's, you know the one that started this whole thread...
- 23/03/2013 06:26:57 PM
553 Views
i'm aware of her statements, you'll have to actually prove your point....
- 24/03/2013 03:35:11 AM
466 Views
Her bill tried to eliminate my (and everone's) right to own all but 2,000 specific weapons.
- 24/03/2013 12:30:56 PM
569 Views
"A well-regulated militia...."
- 25/03/2013 07:27:48 PM
674 Views
and by REGULATED, the authors meant "able to use it effectively"
- 26/03/2013 01:23:07 PM
564 Views
we are long past the point where defense against tyranny is feasible
- 26/03/2013 07:48:37 PM
561 Views
if there have to be concessions, what do you recommend?
- 20/03/2013 05:10:53 PM
627 Views
That would depend, something of equal value
- 20/03/2013 09:13:23 PM
523 Views
when very little is being given up, how do we determine equal value?
- 20/03/2013 10:31:59 PM
800 Views
Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining
- 21/03/2013 10:53:22 AM
553 Views
Re: Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining
- 21/03/2013 07:16:57 PM
603 Views
Re: Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining
- 21/03/2013 08:53:20 PM
692 Views
some answers
- 21/03/2013 10:04:45 PM
924 Views
Re: some answers
- 21/03/2013 11:33:21 PM
691 Views
Re: the NRA
- 22/03/2013 07:44:06 PM
529 Views
This is a matter of POV bias
- 22/03/2013 09:04:25 PM
484 Views
we will have to agree to disagree then
- 22/03/2013 10:12:02 PM
534 Views
I already knew we disagreed, that's why I suggested bargaining
- 22/03/2013 11:11:04 PM
490 Views
i am merely taking the NRA at their word(s)
- 23/03/2013 12:13:18 AM
485 Views
Re: i am merely taking the NRA at their word(s)
- 23/03/2013 02:04:39 AM
741 Views
i am not trying to sway, just come to an understanding
- 23/03/2013 03:03:14 PM
707 Views
I think you've actually managed to widen our gap
- 23/03/2013 03:53:55 PM
716 Views
yes, because it was a failed attempt to re-boot and start the debate from the beginning.....
- 24/03/2013 03:33:05 AM
887 Views
I've difficulty seeing the point of going back to first principles but I'm willing to try
- 24/03/2013 02:13:29 PM
530 Views
this has been more insightful than our previous tit-for-tat responses, actually
- 26/03/2013 07:40:27 PM
512 Views
There's always room for reaosnable dialogue
- 26/03/2013 10:09:58 PM
803 Views
There are many more laws and regulations on the industry than you seem to be aware of.
- 20/03/2013 03:58:19 PM
583 Views
the existing laws and how they are enforced are completely different problems
- 20/03/2013 05:32:31 PM
574 Views
I have no problems with actually enforcing existing laws, in fact I want to see that before new 1 *NM*
- 21/03/2013 12:17:40 AM
309 Views
I can see the argument for limiting magazine capapcity but it would be hard to enforce
- 20/03/2013 05:11:51 PM
531 Views
as with most laws, some amount of grandfathering will probably be necessary
- 20/03/2013 05:34:57 PM
507 Views
It would be a stupid meaningless "feel good" law as changing magazines takes almost no time. *NM*
- 21/03/2013 01:05:34 PM
287 Views
canada's magazine restrictions are credited with reducing fatalities in a mass shooting
- 21/03/2013 07:22:45 PM
615 Views
Regarding guns sold which are used in crimes
- 20/03/2013 10:41:21 PM
521 Views
Your specified legal requirements already exist. *NM*
- 21/03/2013 02:05:12 AM
263 Views
So what other stipulations would you put into effect? *NM*
- 21/03/2013 02:42:53 AM
281 Views
none- I'd simply actually punish criminals instead of trying to "reform" them. *NM*
- 21/03/2013 01:13:29 PM
300 Views
Criminals need to be punished AND reformed for their inevitable release back into society *NM*
- 21/03/2013 11:58:20 PM
277 Views
I've always been rather partial to the criminal justice system in Heinlein's Starship Troopers novel
- 22/03/2013 02:42:09 AM
629 Views
Yeah you're right. Let's just kill everybody who commits a crime
- 22/03/2013 02:46:49 AM
532 Views
*NM*
That's not in Starship Troopers
- 22/03/2013 12:51:44 PM
549 Views
Yeah, there was a small number of capital offenses (13 I think), most not specified.
- 22/03/2013 05:27:11 PM
526 Views
So what's your solution? Smaller sentences? Or death penalty for everybody?
- 22/03/2013 06:33:13 PM
542 Views
I don't have a truly viable one. I just have a bunch of ideas that no one would want to enact.
- 24/03/2013 12:49:58 PM
544 Views
14 then, he lists stupidity as one in another book 
- 22/03/2013 07:35:13 PM
568 Views
- 22/03/2013 07:35:13 PM
568 Views
Out of curiosity. Is anyone against background checks at gun shows, and if so, why? *NM*
- 21/03/2013 09:38:59 AM
285 Views
Personally, I am worried about criminals with guns. BUT...
- 22/03/2013 03:44:47 PM
790 Views
What you are not factoring into your though process is that most criminals feels the same way.
- 24/03/2013 12:56:04 PM
818 Views
I realize that can be the case. But...
- 25/03/2013 03:32:59 PM
701 Views
Twice I was almost robbed, and my parents were robbed several times.
- 26/03/2013 01:35:11 PM
422 Views