Active Users:420 Time:17/09/2025 03:19:17 AM
I want to stick a wikipedia-style "who?" in there. Tim Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 10:53:02 AM
When conservative commentators say the “Golden Age” of marriage they are usually referring to the 1950s model.


You need to back that up with references. Otherwise you can easily create any kind of straw man you want, and nobody will be able to contradict you.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
What do you think of this intro? - 14/12/2009 06:14:51 AM 768 Views
I'm not a fan of the first two sentences. - 14/12/2009 06:42:10 AM 521 Views
Well, i know for a fact that he doesn't opening with questions - 14/12/2009 07:02:03 AM 657 Views
Ahhh, one of those professors. - 14/12/2009 07:22:46 AM 515 Views
Being sneaky, hmmm. I like this idea. *NM* - 14/12/2009 07:59:39 AM 263 Views
It's like a Pleasentville film review. *NM* - 14/12/2009 09:54:14 AM 209 Views
I actually mention it a few times later. *NM* - 14/12/2009 08:48:11 PM 277 Views
I want to stick a wikipedia-style "who?" in there. - 14/12/2009 10:53:02 AM 513 Views
That's actually how we're taught to write in American high schools... - 14/12/2009 02:39:56 PM 508 Views
Part of my problem is that he hasn't told me what level this is for. - 14/12/2009 03:04:40 PM 488 Views
Aye, but it's an intro. - 15/12/2009 08:07:38 AM 458 Views
You presume correctly - 15/12/2009 02:19:07 PM 578 Views
I smell a strawman... - 15/12/2009 02:25:36 AM 520 Views
Stylistically it needs a lot of work. - 15/12/2009 03:28:24 AM 567 Views
Wow, thanks *NM* - 15/12/2009 02:22:48 PM 279 Views
That was a good critique. *NM* - 16/12/2009 01:21:28 AM 199 Views

Reply to Message