Or, if they don't care that much about the non-insured, then what are they at least offering to lessen the enormous costs in percentage of GDP that the US spends on health care?
seems to be about it, to cut insurance costs.
Disclaimer: Anyone with proper facts are welcome to correct me, this is mostly an impression that I've picked up from watching the health care debate.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? 
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
627 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
627 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
216 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
217 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
224 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
221 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
288 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
243 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
300 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
207 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
200 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
99 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
201 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
204 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
202 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
225 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
257 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
283 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
291 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
204 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
262 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
339 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
193 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
187 Views
I know who I'm voting for! 
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
245 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
245 Views
I'm starting to think.....
- 18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
231 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
106 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
293 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
283 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
309 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
284 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
236 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
218 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
214 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
324 Views