One of the arguments for a public option was that it provided competition in states like Mississippi where there are only a couple of companies offering insurance. So the democratic solution is to create a false economy with a government "competition" instead of simply opening the market up. The idea that a government sponsored entity is the way to provide free market competition leads credence to those who use call them socialist.
How exactly would you like the federal government to "open up" this almost unregulated industry? The feds didn't set up those monopolies anymore than any other in history: Private insurance companies did it in what may not be called collusion but definitely is. And, yes, when you have regional monopolies with gentlemens agreements not to poach each others cash cows, introducing ANY competition is more competitive, by definition. Again, that's why the insurance lobbies that manipulated so much of this bill tried to insert an amendment that would guarantee they continued to use Palins "death panels" as they have for decades, because it holds down their costs, but prevent any federal program from doing the same. Why does private insurance care whether a system in which they're not involved limits costs or not? Maybe because they don't think they can compete with it...?
And, yes, the DEMOCRATIC solution to a problem is always to let the voters run it rather than a private institution, and yes, that's socialism. The only questions are 1) do you believe in democracy and 2) can it be done without trampling inviolable civil rights? The answer to the latter question is "yes" but the answer to the other you'll have to decide for yourself.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 20/01/2010 at 12:06:04 AM
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat?
18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
- 627 Views

to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
- 216 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
- 217 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
- 224 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
- 221 Views
It makes people question their priorities
18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
- 288 Views
Maybe they should.
18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
- 244 Views
You act like America is a collective
18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
- 301 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
- 207 Views
Tort reform
18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
- 200 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
- 99 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
- 201 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
- 204 Views
that simply proves they are inept
19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
- 202 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
- 225 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
- 258 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
- 283 Views
Curious about the last part.
20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
- 292 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
- 205 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
- 262 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
- 339 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
- 193 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
- 187 Views
I know who I'm voting for!
18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
- 245 Views

I'm starting to think.....
18/01/2010 04:33:23 PM
- 231 Views
Certainly, he wouldn't stand a chance without protest votes. *NM*
18/01/2010 04:45:37 PM
- 106 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
- 293 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
- 283 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
- 309 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
- 284 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
- 236 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
- 219 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
- 215 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
- 324 Views