Active Users:1379 Time:02/08/2026 01:21:20 PM
Shall we be technical.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM
There may be no heart, no brain, no anything other than a clump of cells. Further more, it's not like the embryo develops "special" at an early stage. An unwanted pregnancy caught early on may well have an embryo that has zero difference from a dog embryo at the same stage of development.


In essence, we are all just lumps of cells...just at different stages of development. But to go with what you mentioned...

There's a beating heart after 3 weeks. Most women don't even know they are pregnant by that time. A brain isn't much farther after that. Here's a question for you...since when does a particular organ convey humanity? If someone had an artificial heart, are they regarded as no longer human? How about for those moments when a person is having a heart transplant, and a machine is running their circulatory system. Are they so much garbage?

It is very intersting, however that you brought up the development of "special". That is why I am anti-elective abortion. Because none of you (you refering to pro-choice advocates) can point to a distinct place where that "special" develops. When does it go from being a "clump of cells" to a person. The exact moment...exact mind you, when one thing is different from another. There is only one point, one exact & identifiable moment, when this is the case. That point is conception. That is when what was is no longer, and what is goes forward to be something completely new.

We do not base human rights off of a stage of development. We afford newborns, who are far from self-aware, the same rights as we do those who are. We afford those with mental disabilities the same rights as those who have full capabilities. Why is an unborn person (person as defined as a completely seperate individual) not afforded the same rights? Your arguement that its "just a clump of cells" is foolish, as its not "just a clump of cells". Instead, it is a person who will one day have the capability to talk to you.

Oh, and by the way, there is a *huge* difference between a human and dog embryo. Just because things may look similar to the untrained eye does not mean that they are.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Anti-Abortion CBS Super Bowl commercial - 27/01/2010 05:35:37 PM 2200 Views
I think that its a fantastic idea... - 27/01/2010 05:46:17 PM 1660 Views
agreed... somewhat. - 27/01/2010 05:52:26 PM 1594 Views
See, that's the debate here... - 27/01/2010 06:03:01 PM 1294 Views
depending on the developmental stage, an embryo might be nothign more than a clump of cells. - 27/01/2010 07:18:25 PM 1314 Views
You make baby Allah cry. *NM* - 27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM 698 Views
was it the dog comparison? - 27/01/2010 07:59:22 PM 1422 Views
Nah, Dog is God reversed, after all. - 27/01/2010 08:29:12 PM 1293 Views
parasites! parasites i say!!! - 27/01/2010 08:37:53 PM 1359 Views
yeah except islam allows abortion in certain conditions - 28/01/2010 05:43:29 AM 1342 Views
Do those conditions include "I don't want a baby"? - 28/01/2010 11:52:24 PM 1654 Views
some scholars say yes, some say no - 29/01/2010 05:51:18 AM 1459 Views
Shall we be technical.... - 27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM 1341 Views
And since when are you a trained eye? - 27/01/2010 09:52:05 PM 1483 Views
A valid question - 27/01/2010 10:07:16 PM 1180 Views
Okay then, that's fair enough - 27/01/2010 10:48:10 PM 1336 Views
If there's a chance the mother might die... - 27/01/2010 07:30:54 PM 1306 Views
Which is why I'm against elective abortion - 27/01/2010 09:33:59 PM 1438 Views
Then we are in accord. - 27/01/2010 10:00:32 PM 1344 Views
That works.... - 27/01/2010 10:10:22 PM 1348 Views
And I think that is wonderful. - 27/01/2010 10:33:05 PM 1468 Views
I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad - 27/01/2010 06:21:02 PM 1495 Views
Re: I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad - 27/01/2010 06:35:30 PM 1546 Views
Go ahead and pay for one.... - 27/01/2010 06:37:18 PM 1550 Views
- 27/01/2010 07:01:59 PM 1488 Views
at your - 27/01/2010 07:03:39 PM 1339 Views
how does atheism take anything away? - 27/01/2010 07:20:49 PM 1375 Views
Exactly - 27/01/2010 07:29:49 PM 1155 Views
Smiles.... - 27/01/2010 09:38:25 PM 1431 Views
just because you believe in god - 27/01/2010 09:57:39 PM 1253 Views
losing, not loosing *NM* - 27/01/2010 10:22:51 PM 725 Views
Re: Smiles.... - 29/01/2010 09:03:48 PM 1381 Views
LOL It only "takes away" mental enslavement. - 27/01/2010 07:50:56 PM 1373 Views
Who says? - 27/01/2010 09:42:07 PM 1335 Views
You're not "open" to anything. - 27/01/2010 10:02:03 PM 1461 Views
I don't need your sadness dude...or your pity. - 27/01/2010 10:19:43 PM 1472 Views
Personally speaking - 27/01/2010 10:36:45 PM 1209 Views
Although off topic that's exactly how I see it too. *NM* - 27/01/2010 10:43:49 PM 722 Views
But notice your perspective Brian... - 27/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 1491 Views
Your argument assumes in the existance of the Christian God. - 27/01/2010 11:28:16 PM 1416 Views
Because we're His children - 28/01/2010 01:08:20 AM 1447 Views
My perspective as someone who is for the most part an Atheist? - 28/01/2010 01:13:02 AM 1286 Views
You have a very odd and self-serving notion of what "open" is. - 28/01/2010 12:12:06 AM 4680 Views
Tolerance much? - 27/01/2010 08:11:12 PM 1527 Views
I took care of that. - 27/01/2010 08:33:18 PM 1452 Views
Don't read an emotion into that I didn't put into it. - 27/01/2010 09:44:37 PM 1190 Views
Oh, well there are examples. Google those ads I mentioned - 27/01/2010 11:24:10 PM 1191 Views
all athesim means is not believing in deities 9_9 - 27/01/2010 11:30:37 PM 1228 Views
Your comment is rude and narrow minded. Regardless of what emotion you feel - 28/01/2010 03:20:11 PM 1263 Views
Fortunately, positivity doesn't appear to be the qualifying characteristic - 27/01/2010 08:26:28 PM 1403 Views
Well there is a difference between... - 27/01/2010 09:47:36 PM 1589 Views
The fact is that it was a positive message, whether you agreed with it or not. - 27/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1326 Views
Says the Protestant. - 27/01/2010 11:22:05 PM 1322 Views
What is the UCC? *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:59:07 AM 736 Views
United Church of Christ - 29/01/2010 02:24:11 PM 1247 Views
I don't think it is the same thing - 27/01/2010 07:17:19 PM 1322 Views
I wasn't making an argument- just that it'd be interesting - 27/01/2010 08:11:57 PM 1196 Views
that I can agree with - 27/01/2010 08:27:30 PM 1186 Views
Re: I think that its a fantastic idea... - 28/01/2010 03:36:11 AM 1391 Views
Hey whatever they want to pay for - 27/01/2010 05:52:11 PM 1410 Views
Hahahaha... I couldn't care less, but this line cracked me up - 27/01/2010 06:19:37 PM 1396 Views
wow...I didn't even think of that... - 27/01/2010 06:39:04 PM 1408 Views
Heh. *NM* - 28/01/2010 10:43:43 PM 719 Views
I think they need to treat all sides the same - 27/01/2010 06:49:47 PM 1391 Views
agreed *NM* - 27/01/2010 07:15:48 PM 730 Views
this. *NM* - 28/01/2010 01:33:01 AM 617 Views
whether you agree with Tebow or not... - 27/01/2010 06:51:58 PM 1266 Views
I don't think there'd be a problem if it wasn't the Super Bowl - 27/01/2010 07:35:18 PM 1435 Views
The problem is the hyprocrisy of CBS. - 27/01/2010 07:56:58 PM 1547 Views
Bingo. - 27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM 998 Views
And they claim this is the result of you liberal types pissing and moaning. - 27/01/2010 08:40:57 PM 1377 Views
Yeah, I'm sure that's it. - 27/01/2010 08:44:26 PM 1185 Views
"the buggery agenda" - 27/01/2010 08:47:28 PM 1435 Views
I know, I loved it! I might start using that instead of Fagenda. *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:03:53 PM 709 Views
You might need to rework titles too. "Most Buggered", "Her Buggerness" - 27/01/2010 09:06:44 PM 1545 Views
this commercial is only a big deal to those - 27/01/2010 07:59:27 PM 1404 Views
I really, really hope a pro-choice group buys the next ad space - 27/01/2010 08:09:16 PM 1274 Views
Replace Hitler with Ben Affleck and I'd help pay for it. - 27/01/2010 08:12:25 PM 1276 Views
that's funny enough it'd pay for itself - 27/01/2010 08:13:31 PM 1377 Views
But how would you folks argue on the internet then? I'd still have Stalin... *NM* - 27/01/2010 08:49:17 PM 692 Views
I'm sure people could think of something *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:00:23 PM 582 Views
LMAO! that would be awesome *NM* - 28/01/2010 12:02:25 AM 725 Views
The funny thing is - 27/01/2010 08:28:22 PM 1623 Views
Oh no you di'in't! - 27/01/2010 08:54:47 PM 1115 Views
I had a similar thought... - 27/01/2010 10:17:15 PM 1392 Views
*NM* - 28/01/2010 01:12:46 AM 664 Views
*brain explodes* - 27/01/2010 08:30:51 PM 1155 Views
are your sinuses clear now? *NM* - 27/01/2010 08:54:18 PM 671 Views
Oddly enough, they aren't. - 27/01/2010 08:59:27 PM 1450 Views
thats what you get for living in the hill country - 27/01/2010 09:10:09 PM 1105 Views
Not my idea, and I'm working on it. - 28/01/2010 12:36:17 AM 1309 Views
the super bowl is no place for political messages, no matter how thinly veiled. - 28/01/2010 05:15:13 AM 1217 Views
Are you saying that CBS should be required to run an opposing ad? *NM* - 28/01/2010 05:19:39 AM 675 Views
if they are going to approve a political message, they should be required to air the opposite view - 28/01/2010 05:27:33 AM 1034 Views
I'm pretty strongly pro-choice and even I find that silly. *NM* - 28/01/2010 06:55:37 AM 735 Views
What kind of ad would they run in response? - 28/01/2010 11:50:10 PM 1332 Views
more like.... - 29/01/2010 03:20:24 AM 1534 Views
The problem with Pro-Choice is... - 28/01/2010 02:12:13 PM 1304 Views
Not really a fair comment - 28/01/2010 02:44:21 PM 1225 Views
Re: Not really a fair comment - 28/01/2010 03:27:03 PM 1252 Views
I can't see Youtube at work and am out the next couple of nights so I can't see it till the weekend - 28/01/2010 03:36:48 PM 1082 Views
I know you were going to tell me that it was slanted... - 28/01/2010 03:57:37 PM 1362 Views
That is unfair on me - 28/01/2010 04:18:07 PM 1444 Views
Sorry...wasn't trying to be unfair.... - 28/01/2010 04:34:18 PM 1287 Views
Apology accepted - 28/01/2010 04:52:39 PM 1150 Views
...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare - 28/01/2010 03:46:25 PM 1311 Views
Re: ...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare - 28/01/2010 04:03:46 PM 1416 Views
An unfortunate choice of words.... - 28/01/2010 07:00:18 PM 1106 Views
I don't think it's so much a matter of supplying misleading information, - 28/01/2010 11:07:24 PM 1342 Views
Ah, - 29/01/2010 02:51:22 PM 1293 Views
No. - 29/01/2010 06:10:47 PM 1270 Views

Reply to Message