There may be no heart, no brain, no anything other than a clump of cells. Further more, it's not like the embryo develops "special" at an early stage. An unwanted pregnancy caught early on may well have an embryo that has zero difference from a dog embryo at the same stage of development.
In essence, we are all just lumps of cells...just at different stages of development. But to go with what you mentioned...
There's a beating heart after 3 weeks. Most women don't even know they are pregnant by that time. A brain isn't much farther after that. Here's a question for you...since when does a particular organ convey humanity? If someone had an artificial heart, are they regarded as no longer human? How about for those moments when a person is having a heart transplant, and a machine is running their circulatory system. Are they so much garbage?
It is very intersting, however that you brought up the development of "special". That is why I am anti-elective abortion. Because none of you (you refering to pro-choice advocates) can point to a distinct place where that "special" develops. When does it go from being a "clump of cells" to a person. The exact moment...exact mind you, when one thing is different from another. There is only one point, one exact & identifiable moment, when this is the case. That point is conception. That is when what was is no longer, and what is goes forward to be something completely new.
We do not base human rights off of a stage of development. We afford newborns, who are far from self-aware, the same rights as we do those who are. We afford those with mental disabilities the same rights as those who have full capabilities. Why is an unborn person (person as defined as a completely seperate individual) not afforded the same rights? Your arguement that its "just a clump of cells" is foolish, as its not "just a clump of cells". Instead, it is a person who will one day have the capability to talk to you.
Oh, and by the way, there is a *huge* difference between a human and dog embryo. Just because things may look similar to the untrained eye does not mean that they are.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Anti-Abortion CBS Super Bowl commercial
- 27/01/2010 05:35:37 PM
2201 Views
I think that its a fantastic idea...
- 27/01/2010 05:46:17 PM
1663 Views
agreed... somewhat.
- 27/01/2010 05:52:26 PM
1596 Views
See, that's the debate here...
- 27/01/2010 06:03:01 PM
1298 Views
depending on the developmental stage, an embryo might be nothign more than a clump of cells.
- 27/01/2010 07:18:25 PM
1315 Views
You make baby Allah cry. *NM*
- 27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM
698 Views
was it the dog comparison?
- 27/01/2010 07:59:22 PM
1424 Views
yeah except islam allows abortion in certain conditions
- 28/01/2010 05:43:29 AM
1345 Views
Shall we be technical....
- 27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM
1344 Views
And since when are you a trained eye?
- 27/01/2010 09:52:05 PM
1486 Views
If there's a chance the mother might die...
- 27/01/2010 07:30:54 PM
1308 Views
What if the "real" preson is an asshole? I'd gamble on the baby who has the potential to not be.
- 27/01/2010 08:44:57 PM
1416 Views
I wasn't commenting on the commercial, I did that further below.
- 27/01/2010 08:59:17 PM
1338 Views
Which is why I'm against elective abortion
- 27/01/2010 09:33:59 PM
1439 Views
Then we are in accord.
- 27/01/2010 10:00:32 PM
1348 Views
I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad
- 27/01/2010 06:21:02 PM
1497 Views
Go ahead and pay for one....
- 27/01/2010 06:37:18 PM
1553 Views
how does atheism take anything away?
- 27/01/2010 07:20:49 PM
1378 Views
LOL It only "takes away" mental enslavement.
- 27/01/2010 07:50:56 PM
1375 Views
Who says?
- 27/01/2010 09:42:07 PM
1339 Views
You're not "open" to anything.
- 27/01/2010 10:02:03 PM
1464 Views
I don't need your sadness dude...or your pity.
- 27/01/2010 10:19:43 PM
1476 Views
Personally speaking
- 27/01/2010 10:36:45 PM
1210 Views
Tolerance much?
- 27/01/2010 08:11:12 PM
1529 Views
Don't read an emotion into that I didn't put into it.
- 27/01/2010 09:44:37 PM
1195 Views
Your comment is rude and narrow minded. Regardless of what emotion you feel
- 28/01/2010 03:20:11 PM
1264 Views
Fortunately, positivity doesn't appear to be the qualifying characteristic
- 27/01/2010 08:26:28 PM
1405 Views
Well there is a difference between...
- 27/01/2010 09:47:36 PM
1593 Views
The fact is that it was a positive message, whether you agreed with it or not.
- 27/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1329 Views
I don't think it is the same thing
- 27/01/2010 07:17:19 PM
1323 Views
Followed by an add of all the babies that should have been aborted? *NM*
- 29/01/2010 05:53:43 PM
694 Views
The problem is the hyprocrisy of CBS.
- 27/01/2010 07:56:58 PM
1550 Views
And they claim this is the result of you liberal types pissing and moaning.
- 27/01/2010 08:40:57 PM
1378 Views
"the buggery agenda"
- 27/01/2010 08:47:28 PM
1437 Views
I know, I loved it! I might start using that instead of Fagenda.
*NM*
- 27/01/2010 09:03:53 PM
710 Views
*NM*
- 27/01/2010 09:03:53 PM
710 Views
You might need to rework titles too. "Most Buggered", "Her Buggerness"
- 27/01/2010 09:06:44 PM
1547 Views
I really, really hope a pro-choice group buys the next ad space
- 27/01/2010 08:09:16 PM
1276 Views
Replace Hitler with Ben Affleck and I'd help pay for it.
- 27/01/2010 08:12:25 PM
1278 Views
- 27/01/2010 08:12:25 PM
1278 Views
That would work also. The main thing is to pick someone who has committed crimes against humanity
- 28/01/2010 10:57:28 AM
1140 Views
But how would you folks argue on the internet then? I'd still have Stalin... *NM*
- 27/01/2010 08:49:17 PM
692 Views
*brain explodes*
- 27/01/2010 08:30:51 PM
1157 Views
are your sinuses clear now?
*NM*
- 27/01/2010 08:54:18 PM
671 Views
*NM*
- 27/01/2010 08:54:18 PM
671 Views
Oddly enough, they aren't.
- 27/01/2010 08:59:27 PM
1453 Views
the super bowl is no place for political messages, no matter how thinly veiled.
- 28/01/2010 05:15:13 AM
1219 Views
Are you saying that CBS should be required to run an opposing ad? *NM*
- 28/01/2010 05:19:39 AM
675 Views
if they are going to approve a political message, they should be required to air the opposite view
- 28/01/2010 05:27:33 AM
1037 Views
The problem with Pro-Choice is...
- 28/01/2010 02:12:13 PM
1305 Views
Not really a fair comment
- 28/01/2010 02:44:21 PM
1228 Views
Re: Not really a fair comment
- 28/01/2010 03:27:03 PM
1254 Views
I can't see Youtube at work and am out the next couple of nights so I can't see it till the weekend
- 28/01/2010 03:36:48 PM
1084 Views
I know you were going to tell me that it was slanted...
- 28/01/2010 03:57:37 PM
1364 Views
That is unfair on me
- 28/01/2010 04:18:07 PM
1445 Views
...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare
- 28/01/2010 03:46:25 PM
1313 Views
Re: ...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare
- 28/01/2010 04:03:46 PM
1420 Views
I don't think it's so much a matter of supplying misleading information,
- 28/01/2010 11:07:24 PM
1344 Views



