Active Users:505 Time:02/05/2025 07:33:14 PM
Shall we be technical.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM
There may be no heart, no brain, no anything other than a clump of cells. Further more, it's not like the embryo develops "special" at an early stage. An unwanted pregnancy caught early on may well have an embryo that has zero difference from a dog embryo at the same stage of development.


In essence, we are all just lumps of cells...just at different stages of development. But to go with what you mentioned...

There's a beating heart after 3 weeks. Most women don't even know they are pregnant by that time. A brain isn't much farther after that. Here's a question for you...since when does a particular organ convey humanity? If someone had an artificial heart, are they regarded as no longer human? How about for those moments when a person is having a heart transplant, and a machine is running their circulatory system. Are they so much garbage?

It is very intersting, however that you brought up the development of "special". That is why I am anti-elective abortion. Because none of you (you refering to pro-choice advocates) can point to a distinct place where that "special" develops. When does it go from being a "clump of cells" to a person. The exact moment...exact mind you, when one thing is different from another. There is only one point, one exact & identifiable moment, when this is the case. That point is conception. That is when what was is no longer, and what is goes forward to be something completely new.

We do not base human rights off of a stage of development. We afford newborns, who are far from self-aware, the same rights as we do those who are. We afford those with mental disabilities the same rights as those who have full capabilities. Why is an unborn person (person as defined as a completely seperate individual) not afforded the same rights? Your arguement that its "just a clump of cells" is foolish, as its not "just a clump of cells". Instead, it is a person who will one day have the capability to talk to you.

Oh, and by the way, there is a *huge* difference between a human and dog embryo. Just because things may look similar to the untrained eye does not mean that they are.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Anti-Abortion CBS Super Bowl commercial - 27/01/2010 05:35:37 PM 1842 Views
I think that its a fantastic idea... - 27/01/2010 05:46:17 PM 1109 Views
agreed... somewhat. - 27/01/2010 05:52:26 PM 1051 Views
See, that's the debate here... - 27/01/2010 06:03:01 PM 860 Views
depending on the developmental stage, an embryo might be nothign more than a clump of cells. - 27/01/2010 07:18:25 PM 741 Views
You make baby Allah cry. *NM* - 27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM 524 Views
was it the dog comparison? - 27/01/2010 07:59:22 PM 904 Views
Nah, Dog is God reversed, after all. - 27/01/2010 08:29:12 PM 859 Views
parasites! parasites i say!!! - 27/01/2010 08:37:53 PM 883 Views
yeah except islam allows abortion in certain conditions - 28/01/2010 05:43:29 AM 877 Views
Do those conditions include "I don't want a baby"? - 28/01/2010 11:52:24 PM 1096 Views
some scholars say yes, some say no - 29/01/2010 05:51:18 AM 992 Views
Shall we be technical.... - 27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM 870 Views
And since when are you a trained eye? - 27/01/2010 09:52:05 PM 976 Views
A valid question - 27/01/2010 10:07:16 PM 853 Views
Okay then, that's fair enough - 27/01/2010 10:48:10 PM 867 Views
If there's a chance the mother might die... - 27/01/2010 07:30:54 PM 934 Views
Which is why I'm against elective abortion - 27/01/2010 09:33:59 PM 889 Views
Then we are in accord. - 27/01/2010 10:00:32 PM 899 Views
That works.... - 27/01/2010 10:10:22 PM 896 Views
And I think that is wonderful. - 27/01/2010 10:33:05 PM 990 Views
I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad - 27/01/2010 06:21:02 PM 933 Views
Re: I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad - 27/01/2010 06:35:30 PM 914 Views
Go ahead and pay for one.... - 27/01/2010 06:37:18 PM 1009 Views
- 27/01/2010 07:01:59 PM 937 Views
at your - 27/01/2010 07:03:39 PM 883 Views
how does atheism take anything away? - 27/01/2010 07:20:49 PM 917 Views
Exactly - 27/01/2010 07:29:49 PM 896 Views
Smiles.... - 27/01/2010 09:38:25 PM 881 Views
just because you believe in god - 27/01/2010 09:57:39 PM 761 Views
losing, not loosing *NM* - 27/01/2010 10:22:51 PM 534 Views
Re: Smiles.... - 29/01/2010 09:03:48 PM 847 Views
LOL It only "takes away" mental enslavement. - 27/01/2010 07:50:56 PM 890 Views
Who says? - 27/01/2010 09:42:07 PM 879 Views
You're not "open" to anything. - 27/01/2010 10:02:03 PM 1017 Views
I don't need your sadness dude...or your pity. - 27/01/2010 10:19:43 PM 903 Views
Personally speaking - 27/01/2010 10:36:45 PM 943 Views
Although off topic that's exactly how I see it too. *NM* - 27/01/2010 10:43:49 PM 525 Views
But notice your perspective Brian... - 27/01/2010 11:08:52 PM 1007 Views
Your argument assumes in the existance of the Christian God. - 27/01/2010 11:28:16 PM 865 Views
Because we're His children - 28/01/2010 01:08:20 AM 904 Views
My perspective as someone who is for the most part an Atheist? - 28/01/2010 01:13:02 AM 815 Views
You have a very odd and self-serving notion of what "open" is. - 28/01/2010 12:12:06 AM 4236 Views
Tolerance much? - 27/01/2010 08:11:12 PM 940 Views
I took care of that. - 27/01/2010 08:33:18 PM 917 Views
Don't read an emotion into that I didn't put into it. - 27/01/2010 09:44:37 PM 727 Views
Oh, well there are examples. Google those ads I mentioned - 27/01/2010 11:24:10 PM 729 Views
all athesim means is not believing in deities 9_9 - 27/01/2010 11:30:37 PM 738 Views
Fortunately, positivity doesn't appear to be the qualifying characteristic - 27/01/2010 08:26:28 PM 839 Views
Well there is a difference between... - 27/01/2010 09:47:36 PM 1031 Views
The fact is that it was a positive message, whether you agreed with it or not. - 27/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 899 Views
Says the Protestant. - 27/01/2010 11:22:05 PM 888 Views
What is the UCC? *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:59:07 AM 548 Views
United Church of Christ - 29/01/2010 02:24:11 PM 780 Views
I don't think it is the same thing - 27/01/2010 07:17:19 PM 747 Views
I wasn't making an argument- just that it'd be interesting - 27/01/2010 08:11:57 PM 728 Views
that I can agree with - 27/01/2010 08:27:30 PM 834 Views
Re: I think that its a fantastic idea... - 28/01/2010 03:36:11 AM 841 Views
Hey whatever they want to pay for - 27/01/2010 05:52:11 PM 937 Views
Hahahaha... I couldn't care less, but this line cracked me up - 27/01/2010 06:19:37 PM 927 Views
wow...I didn't even think of that... - 27/01/2010 06:39:04 PM 869 Views
Heh. *NM* - 28/01/2010 10:43:43 PM 537 Views
I think they need to treat all sides the same - 27/01/2010 06:49:47 PM 870 Views
agreed *NM* - 27/01/2010 07:15:48 PM 532 Views
this. *NM* - 28/01/2010 01:33:01 AM 474 Views
whether you agree with Tebow or not... - 27/01/2010 06:51:58 PM 901 Views
I don't think there'd be a problem if it wasn't the Super Bowl - 27/01/2010 07:35:18 PM 868 Views
The problem is the hyprocrisy of CBS. - 27/01/2010 07:56:58 PM 991 Views
Bingo. - 27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM 743 Views
And they claim this is the result of you liberal types pissing and moaning. - 27/01/2010 08:40:57 PM 829 Views
Yeah, I'm sure that's it. - 27/01/2010 08:44:26 PM 732 Views
"the buggery agenda" - 27/01/2010 08:47:28 PM 870 Views
I know, I loved it! I might start using that instead of Fagenda. *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:03:53 PM 546 Views
You might need to rework titles too. "Most Buggered", "Her Buggerness" - 27/01/2010 09:06:44 PM 1004 Views
this commercial is only a big deal to those - 27/01/2010 07:59:27 PM 936 Views
I really, really hope a pro-choice group buys the next ad space - 27/01/2010 08:09:16 PM 1015 Views
Replace Hitler with Ben Affleck and I'd help pay for it. - 27/01/2010 08:12:25 PM 745 Views
that's funny enough it'd pay for itself - 27/01/2010 08:13:31 PM 838 Views
But how would you folks argue on the internet then? I'd still have Stalin... *NM* - 27/01/2010 08:49:17 PM 507 Views
I'm sure people could think of something *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:00:23 PM 403 Views
LMAO! that would be awesome *NM* - 28/01/2010 12:02:25 AM 545 Views
The funny thing is - 27/01/2010 08:28:22 PM 1050 Views
Oh no you di'in't! - 27/01/2010 08:54:47 PM 658 Views
I had a similar thought... - 27/01/2010 10:17:15 PM 853 Views
*NM* - 28/01/2010 01:12:46 AM 486 Views
*brain explodes* - 27/01/2010 08:30:51 PM 763 Views
are your sinuses clear now? *NM* - 27/01/2010 08:54:18 PM 495 Views
Oddly enough, they aren't. - 27/01/2010 08:59:27 PM 908 Views
thats what you get for living in the hill country - 27/01/2010 09:10:09 PM 829 Views
Not my idea, and I'm working on it. - 28/01/2010 12:36:17 AM 862 Views
the super bowl is no place for political messages, no matter how thinly veiled. - 28/01/2010 05:15:13 AM 764 Views
Are you saying that CBS should be required to run an opposing ad? *NM* - 28/01/2010 05:19:39 AM 481 Views
if they are going to approve a political message, they should be required to air the opposite view - 28/01/2010 05:27:33 AM 758 Views
I'm pretty strongly pro-choice and even I find that silly. *NM* - 28/01/2010 06:55:37 AM 545 Views
What kind of ad would they run in response? - 28/01/2010 11:50:10 PM 889 Views
more like.... - 29/01/2010 03:20:24 AM 1006 Views
The problem with Pro-Choice is... - 28/01/2010 02:12:13 PM 867 Views
Not really a fair comment - 28/01/2010 02:44:21 PM 846 Views
Re: Not really a fair comment - 28/01/2010 03:27:03 PM 960 Views
I can't see Youtube at work and am out the next couple of nights so I can't see it till the weekend - 28/01/2010 03:36:48 PM 733 Views
I know you were going to tell me that it was slanted... - 28/01/2010 03:57:37 PM 881 Views
That is unfair on me - 28/01/2010 04:18:07 PM 875 Views
Sorry...wasn't trying to be unfair.... - 28/01/2010 04:34:18 PM 909 Views
Apology accepted - 28/01/2010 04:52:39 PM 713 Views
...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare - 28/01/2010 03:46:25 PM 743 Views
Re: ...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare - 28/01/2010 04:03:46 PM 858 Views
An unfortunate choice of words.... - 28/01/2010 07:00:18 PM 737 Views
I don't think it's so much a matter of supplying misleading information, - 28/01/2010 11:07:24 PM 798 Views
Ah, - 29/01/2010 02:51:22 PM 845 Views
No. - 29/01/2010 06:10:47 PM 936 Views

Reply to Message