Active Users:357 Time:10/08/2025 02:28:09 AM
I don't think that's the case Isaac Send a noteboard - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM

For all the pomp and circumstance, the last two Democratic Presidents were elected largely (in Clintons case, solely) on the basis of promised healthcare reform, providing a clear mandate for it twice in as many decades. Both times the industry convinced the public they didn't really want what they voted for en masse. In less than six months. Well done, America.... :rolleyes:


I remember both elections, in spite of my youth at the time of the latter, and I can't see Healtchare Reform as a major factor in swaying the middle. First, Clinton had no mandate at all,less than 51% is definetly not a mandate, he got 43%. Everyone who was voting specifically for change from the middle was voting Perot. No matter how one cuts it, Obama was essentially elected for being 'not-Bush' and the GOP suffered from the same, while having more vulnerable senate seats.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 885 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 619 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 572 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 652 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 231 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 252 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 606 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 464 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 488 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 522 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 543 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 585 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 516 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 491 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 622 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 451 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 513 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 497 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 478 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 611 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 629 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 577 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 607 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 585 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 570 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 600 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 624 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 564 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 614 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 703 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 699 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 501 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 570 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 470 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 482 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 522 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 545 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 446 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 506 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 652 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 471 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 495 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 609 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 677 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1013 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 475 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 491 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 418 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 451 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 379 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 536 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 482 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 655 Views

Reply to Message