Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
They really don't even go to much effort to hide it. Sorry that is a simple fact. You always refute my statement with some actual fact but until then you really are simply in denial. Their anchors are liberal and their reporting is liberal. Your claim that it would be against their best interest would hold some merit if not for the fact that republicans have repeatedly attempted to cut their funding and failed.
Oh, have they now? When's the last time you saw Bill Moyers on TV? Have you heard that the News Hour will soon be "the News Half Hour"? Hell, Bush had a member of the FCC resign in protest because of what the guy appointed to run it was pulling. I've very seldom heard any editorializing on the News Hour or Washington Week; the former confines its reporters almost exclusively to facts and when they have a panel discussion they take pains to ensure all sides of an issue are represented (I tend to not like panel discussions though because representing all biased perspectives doesn't equal an objective one. ) The latter tends to delve into partisan views because it's JUST politics, but it's usually in the form of "this is what the Democrats say they're trying and expect and this is what the Republicans say they're trying to do and expect. "
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
- 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
1016 Views
And a personal comment
- 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
754 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
- 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
783 Views
? *NM*
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
- 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
602 Views
Even so.
- 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
642 Views
Like the NYT?
- 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
647 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
- 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
669 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
- 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
727 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
- 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
644 Views
PBS is biased
- 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
624 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
- 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
771 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
- 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
595 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
- 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
722 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
- 09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
676 Views
We have been for some time.
- 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
679 Views
I don't think that's the case
- 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
632 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
- 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
612 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
- 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
735 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
782 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
737 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
- 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
736 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
- 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
731 Views
'K
- 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
734 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
- 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
755 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
- 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
751 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
- 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
707 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
- 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
784 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
- 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
620 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
- 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
712 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
- 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
609 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
- 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
615 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
- 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
658 Views
Whom do you prefer?
- 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
695 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
- 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
588 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it. 
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
651 Views
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
651 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
- 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
659 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
- 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
799 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
- 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
633 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
- 04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
620 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery 
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
621 Views
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
621 Views
Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
- 04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
736 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
- 04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
602 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
- 05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
729 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
- 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
641 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
- 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
805 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
- 06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
776 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
- 02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
855 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
- 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
601 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
- 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
619 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
- 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
566 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
- 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
599 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
- 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
501 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
- 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
700 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
- 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
614 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
- 09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
659 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
- 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
628 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
- 10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
789 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
- 13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
597 Views
